Weaving individual and collective rights: language of rights in Women´s petitions to the Constitutional Convention of 1949 and their previous experiences up to the Reform (1946-1949)
Law´s constitutional history keeps away certain actors part of the 1949 constitutional reform. Analyzing women's petitions to the National Congress and the Constituent Assembly, this paper investigates how, during the first Peronism, these groups linked their individual demands with collectives...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Grupo Prohistoria
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1795 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Law´s constitutional history keeps away certain actors part of the 1949 constitutional reform. Analyzing women's petitions to the National Congress and the Constituent Assembly, this paper investigates how, during the first Peronism, these groups linked their individual demands with collectives claims, in times where the liberal notion of rights was constitutionally challenged, highlighting the use of rights language present in their demands. We will resort to documentary analysis focusing on perspectives "from below" that emphasize the role of these other actors in the reform, bringing back their participation strategies. |
|---|