Peronism and Prochronism
This paper studies the common characteristics that cross different interpretations of early Peronism in the Social Sciences. The selected authors are Emílio de Ípola, Juan Carlos Portantiero, Juan Carlos Torre, Daniel James y Ernesto Laclau. The working hypothesis is that a certain anachronism can b...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Grupo Prohistoria
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ojs.rosario-conicet.gov.ar/index.php/prohistoria/article/view/1721 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This paper studies the common characteristics that cross different interpretations of early Peronism in the Social Sciences. The selected authors are Emílio de Ípola, Juan Carlos Portantiero, Juan Carlos Torre, Daniel James y Ernesto Laclau. The working hypothesis is that a certain anachronism can be detected in these major works. This would consist in the projection of the experience of the 1970s in these approaches. Finally, the effects of the anachronism explored in the agenda of studies on early Peronism are discussed. Particularly, the “history from below” and the critique of normalization. |
|---|