The health of indigenous peoples between making live and letting live: Reflections from the COVID-19 pandemic

Within the framework of the present call for papers, the article reflects on the tensions that the pandemic exacerbated between health as a universal right, the particular rights of indigenous peoples, and the regional health practices of these peoples. From there, it aims to analyze the way in whic...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sabatella, María Emilia
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Escuela de Filosofía. Facultad de Humanidades y Artes, Universidad Nacional de Rosario 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://cuadernosfilosoficos.unr.edu.ar/index.php/cf/article/view/133
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:Within the framework of the present call for papers, the article reflects on the tensions that the pandemic exacerbated between health as a universal right, the particular rights of indigenous peoples, and the regional health practices of these peoples. From there, it aims to analyze the way in which through the regulations and protocols to prevent the spread of Covid-19, sanctioned by the State of Argentina, forms of government were administered in Foucauldian terms to make people live (and its counterpart: letting die) that came into tension and excluded other ways of living belonging to indigenous peoples (and the respective normative frameworks that guarantee the right to their ways of life). In order to problematize these exclusions, we will focus mainly on the claims made by the indigenous movement and, in particular, by Mapuche communities and organizations, which were articulating a request for them to let them live. Letting live implied a complaint regarding the implementation of health measures which, as they were being managed, did not guarantee access to health for these peoples within the biomedical system, nor the continuity of their own health practices and systems.