Evaluación de métodos de estimación de la evapotranspiración a escala mensual y anual en Argentina:: aplicación en zonas húmedas, semiáridas y áridas
The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimated evapotranspiration with three methods of estimatingevapotranspiration (Priestley and Taylor (PT), Turc (T) and Hargreaves (HG)) in relation to the referencemethod FAO 56 Penman Monteith (FAO 56 PM.) The evaluation is done from statistical analysis t...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
CURIHAM: Centro Universitario Rosario de Investigaciones Hidroambientales Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingeniería y Agrimensura. Universidad Nacional de Rosario Director: Dr. Ing. Hernán Stenta Riobamba 245 bis, 2000 Rosario (Santa Fe), Argentina. Telefa
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://cuadernosdelcuriham.unr.edu.ar/index.php/CURIHAM/article/view/55 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this study is to evaluate the estimated evapotranspiration with three methods of estimatingevapotranspiration (Priestley and Taylor (PT), Turc (T) and Hargreaves (HG)) in relation to the referencemethod FAO 56 Penman Monteith (FAO 56 PM.) The evaluation is done from statistical analysis to stationslocated in humid areas, semi-arid and arid Argentina. The results show the method of HG provides reliablevalues of ET for areas of arid to semiarid climate and that is the fact that this methodology is easilyapplicable and requires as input the equation values maximum and minimum temperature. Regarding thehumid zone, the equation of PT and secondly that of T, presented a better performance, both are practicalmethodologies and less complex. |
|---|