Barthes con Lacan: lecturas impertinentes
Analist/Analisante, writer/reader: Reading dilutes any pair of oppositions. If reading occures you can no longer delimit identity borders: writer/reader but, instead, we can afirm it reads, it writes. We will try to specify what way the reading in Barthes resists being systematized, and in this poin...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
CETYCLI
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://badebec.unr.edu.ar/index.php/badebec/article/view/402 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Analist/Analisante, writer/reader: Reading dilutes any pair of oppositions. If reading occures you can no longer delimit identity borders: writer/reader but, instead, we can afirm it reads, it writes. We will try to specify what way the reading in Barthes resists being systematized, and in this point, the way Barthes shifts relevance to the congenital impertinence of reading. The reading is impertinent, not because of “our lack of genius”, but because it, the reading, causes failure, at the same time as the “search for relevance”, to the “very concept of relevance”. |
|---|