The concept of flesh in the first theology and the «speaking body»
The text proposes, on the condition of contextualizing and re-reading historically the significant flesh of the Judeo-Christian tradition, that the margin “beyond life” that Lacan places between body and signifier in 1960 refers to a place analogous to that occupied by so much semantics as syntactic...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/19 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The text proposes, on the condition of contextualizing and re-reading historically the significant flesh of the Judeo-Christian tradition, that the margin “beyond life” that Lacan places between body and signifier in 1960 refers to a place analogous to that occupied by so much semantics as syntactically, the signifiers Latin expensive and Greek σαρζ, which translate the Hebrew ba-sar (flesh). By historical retroaction, and giving precedence to the letter on the sense, it would be seen that the first theological texts place this signifier in a place of “béance”, or at least of unsustainable contradiction, where nothing representable or thinkable can produce a synthesis. Interrupting the soul / body platonic dualism, the flesh of Christianity, which is neither body nor soul, disorganizes duality, opening up a ternary body / flesh / spirit system, a conceptual referent that probably feeds Lacan’s last teaching and where the «meat» responds to a Real. |
|---|