A diagnosis that does not say what the subject is
Even though it has been over a century now since Psychoanalysis was be-queathed to us by Sigmund Freud, the question about diagnosis and its praxis specifica-tion is still open. Aftertastes of the medical-psychiatric practice still penetrate its scope, questioning us. Is there any possibility of not...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Departamento de Psicoanálisis de la Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://psicoanalisisenlauniversidad.unr.edu.ar/index.php/RPU/article/view/102 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | Even though it has been over a century now since Psychoanalysis was be-queathed to us by Sigmund Freud, the question about diagnosis and its praxis specifica-tion is still open. Aftertastes of the medical-psychiatric practice still penetrate its scope, questioning us. Is there any possibility of not falling into a psychiatric approach to psy-choanalysis? As a novelty, this Thesis contributes to uphold that the Theory of the Four Discourses opens a possible route to produce a clinical clearly distinguished from psy-chiatry. |
|---|