La emergencia de los arquitectos como investigadores profesionales en estudios urbanos
In the sixties, architects acquired urban planning competencies by embracing many of the analysis perspectives from disciplines that disputed the market of plan formulations and diagnostic studies of the city by means of which they became professional researchers on urban issues. This is the central...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Planeamiento y Diseño | Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ayp.fapyd.unr.edu.ar/index.php/ayp/article/view/229 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the sixties, architects acquired urban planning competencies by embracing many of the analysis perspectives from disciplines that disputed the market of plan formulations and diagnostic studies of the city by means of which they became professional researchers on urban issues. This is the central object of our article. In Argentina, the creation of the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET) along with the university policies for promoting research through scholarships and grants, guaranteed the conditions for making it possible. From a methodological approach to this issue, the academic careers of Patricio Randle (1927-2016), Cesar Vapñarsky (1929-2003), and Horacio Torres (1932-2000) are addressed. They were trained abroad and specialized in historical geography, demography, and mathematical models respectively. This legitimized their role as experts within the urban study networks at a time of confidence in planning which, in turn, was later challenged by urban sociology, dependency theory, and radicalized militancy. |
|---|