¿Quién tiene la última palabra? Discurso institucional vs. redes sociales en la descentralización de la gestión del sistema de riego en la cuenca del Río Mendoza
The watery resources management is run by the General Irrigation Department in Mendoza. Since 1994 this Department has driven a policy of democratic management for the distribution of the watering resources, through annual assemblies. Though these assemblies don’t congregate enough people, th...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo Artículo publishedVersion |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Ciencia Política y Relaciones Internacionales, Universidad Nacional de Rosario
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/2133/1453 http://hdl.handle.net/2133/1453 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The watery resources management is run
by the General Irrigation Department in
Mendoza. Since 1994 this Department has
driven a policy of democratic management
for the distribution of the watering resources,
through annual assemblies. Though
these assemblies don’t congregate enough
people, there are informal social networks
that assures everybody the irrigation resources
needed. However this distribution is not
equitable. At least two types of social networks
have been found: one of them has a
higher level of influence for decision making.
The other one is limited to solve watering
problems at a very low level –which
could jeopardise their access to the resourceand
is compounded by less social, economic
and cultural capital agents. |
|---|