EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE
This article analyzes certain results of a recent survey aimed at the universe of those who do research in Uruguay to know their opinions on various aspects associated with their work, focusing on what they think about academic evaluation, whether or not it is advisable to change it and in what dire...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones en Educación Superior del MERCOSUR
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/44216 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R376-article-44216 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-376 |
| container_title_str |
Integración y Conocimiento |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Academic evaluation, researcher’s survey, National System of Researchers, Uruguay Evaluación académica, Encuesta investigadores/as, Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, Uruguay Avaliação acadêmica, inquérito a pesquisadores, Sistema Nacional de Pesquisadores, Uruguai |
| spellingShingle |
Academic evaluation, researcher’s survey, National System of Researchers, Uruguay Evaluación académica, Encuesta investigadores/as, Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, Uruguay Avaliação acadêmica, inquérito a pesquisadores, Sistema Nacional de Pesquisadores, Uruguai Sutz, Judith Gras, Natalia EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE |
| topic_facet |
Academic evaluation, researcher’s survey, National System of Researchers, Uruguay Evaluación académica, Encuesta investigadores/as, Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, Uruguay Avaliação acadêmica, inquérito a pesquisadores, Sistema Nacional de Pesquisadores, Uruguai |
| author |
Sutz, Judith Gras, Natalia |
| author_facet |
Sutz, Judith Gras, Natalia |
| author_sort |
Sutz, Judith |
| title |
EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE |
| title_short |
EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE |
| title_full |
EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE |
| title_fullStr |
EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE |
| title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE |
| title_sort |
evaluation of research: don't change, change, how to change |
| description |
This article analyzes certain results of a recent survey aimed at the universe of those who do research in Uruguay to know their opinions on various aspects associated with their work, focusing on what they think about academic evaluation, whether or not it is advisable to change it and in what directions it should be doing it. Quantitative results are presented, distinguishing the positions of various groups - women and men, academic elites, cognitive areas - and also qualitative results, derived from the hundreds of open responses received. The propensity to change shows, among other aspects, some few consensuses, a clear tendency not to change on the part of academic elites, shared opinions by less strong groups in the research hierarchy, and references to evaluation as part of other problems, for example, harmonization between academic life and family life. Based on the analysis carried out, some convergences of positions are identified that enable directions of change in how research is evaluated in Uruguay, and aspects are pointed out that require in-depth collective discussions to define whether or not to change and, above all, in which direction the change should go. |
| publisher |
Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones en Educación Superior del MERCOSUR |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/44216 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sutzjudith evaluationofresearchdontchangechangehowtochange AT grasnatalia evaluationofresearchdontchangechangehowtochange AT sutzjudith laevaluaciondelainvestigacionnocambiarcambiarcomocambiar AT grasnatalia laevaluaciondelainvestigacionnocambiarcambiarcomocambiar AT sutzjudith avaliacaodepesquisanaomudemudecomomudar AT grasnatalia avaliacaodepesquisanaomudemudecomomudar |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T23:06:22Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T23:06:22Z |
| _version_ |
1809218044801581056 |
| spelling |
I10-R376-article-442162024-02-01T02:16:25Z EVALUATION OF RESEARCH: DON'T CHANGE, CHANGE, HOW TO CHANGE La evaluación de la investigación: no cambiar, cambiar, cómo cambiar AVALIAÇÃO DE PESQUISA: NÃO MUDE, MUDE, COMO MUDAR Sutz, Judith Gras, Natalia Academic evaluation, researcher’s survey, National System of Researchers, Uruguay Evaluación académica, Encuesta investigadores/as, Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, Uruguay Avaliação acadêmica, inquérito a pesquisadores, Sistema Nacional de Pesquisadores, Uruguai This article analyzes certain results of a recent survey aimed at the universe of those who do research in Uruguay to know their opinions on various aspects associated with their work, focusing on what they think about academic evaluation, whether or not it is advisable to change it and in what directions it should be doing it. Quantitative results are presented, distinguishing the positions of various groups - women and men, academic elites, cognitive areas - and also qualitative results, derived from the hundreds of open responses received. The propensity to change shows, among other aspects, some few consensuses, a clear tendency not to change on the part of academic elites, shared opinions by less strong groups in the research hierarchy, and references to evaluation as part of other problems, for example, harmonization between academic life and family life. Based on the analysis carried out, some convergences of positions are identified that enable directions of change in how research is evaluated in Uruguay, and aspects are pointed out that require in-depth collective discussions to define whether or not to change and, above all, in which direction the change should go. Este artículo analiza ciertos resultados de una encuesta reciente dirigida al universo de quienes investigan en Uruguay para conocer sus opiniones sobre diversos aspectos asociados a su trabajo, centrándose en lo que piensan sobre la evaluación académica, si conviene o no cambiarla y en qué direcciones se debería hacerlo. Se presentan resultados cuantitativos, distinguiendo las posiciones de diversos colectivos -mujeres y hombres, élites académicas, áreas cognitivas- y también cualitativos, derivados de los centenares de respuestas abiertas recibidas. La propensión a cambiar muestra, entre otros aspectos, algunos pocos consensos, una clara tendencia a no cambiar por parte de las élites académicas, opiniones compartidas por parte de colectivos menos fuertes en la jerarquía investigativa y referencias a la evaluación como parte de otros problemas, por ejemplo, armonización entre vida académica y vida familiar. A partir del análisis efectuado se identifican algunas convergencias de posiciones que habilitan direcciones de cambio en las formas en que se evalúa la investigación en Uruguay y se señalan aspectos que requieren discusiones colectivas en profundidad para definir si cambiar o no y, sobre todo, hacia dónde cambiar. Este artigo analisa alguns resultados de uma pesquisa recente dirigida ao universo de quem faz pesquisa no Uruguai para conhecer suas opiniões sobre diversos aspectos associados ao seu trabalho, enfocando o que pensam sobre a avaliação acadêmica, se é aconselhável ou não alterá-la. e em que direções deveria estar fazendo isso. São apresentados resultados quantitativos, distinguindo as posições de vários grupos - mulheres e homens, elites académicas, áreas cognitivas - e também resultados qualitativos, derivados das centenas de respostas abertas recebidas. A propensão à mudança mostra, entre outros aspectos, alguns poucos consensos, uma clara tendência de não mudança por parte das elites académicas, opiniões partilhadas por grupos menos fortes na hierarquia da investigação e referências à avaliação como parte de outros problemas, por exemplo , harmonização entre a vida acadêmica e a vida familiar. Com base na análise realizada, identificam-se algumas convergências de posicionamentos que permitem direções de mudança na forma como a pesquisa é avaliada no Uruguai, e apontam-se aspectos que requerem discussões coletivas aprofundadas para definir se deve ou não mudar e, sobretudo, em que direção a mudança deve ir. Núcleo de Estudios e Investigaciones en Educación Superior del MERCOSUR 2024-02-01 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/44216 10.61203/2347-0658.v13.n1.44216 Integración y Conocimiento; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Integración y Conocimiento; 109-135 Integración y Conocimiento; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2024): Integración y Conocimiento; 109-135 Integración y Conocimiento; v. 13 n. 1 (2024): Integración y Conocimiento; 109-135 2347-0658 10.61203/2347-0658.v13.n1 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/integracionyconocimiento/article/view/44216/44569 Derechos de autor 2024 Integración y Conocimiento https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |