Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools
Buildings are responsible for 36% of the global energy demand and more than 30% of the greenhouse gasses principally owing to cooling and heating. This has inspired many countries and institutions to implement certifications of energy efficiency and sustainability like energy efficiency labeling. T...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42380 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R371-article-42380 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R371-article-423802023-12-11T13:30:28Z Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools Simulación higrotérmica vs. etiquetado de vivienda nacional: Análisis crítico de metodologías y herramientas Sulaiman, Halimi Oga Martínez, Lautaro Martín Energetic hygrothermal simulation Housing labeling Bioclimatic design Simulación higrotérmico higrotérmica energética Etiquetado de vivienda Diseño bioclimático Buildings are responsible for 36% of the global energy demand and more than 30% of the greenhouse gasses principally owing to cooling and heating. This has inspired many countries and institutions to implement certifications of energy efficiency and sustainability like energy efficiency labeling. The present work does a critical analysis of some results obtained besides the advantages and disadvantages of the use of National Housing Labeling (EVN) in relation to the implemented by the Bioclimatic design área (ADB) of Sustainable technologies constructions of the Experimental Center for Affordable Housing. To achieve this an apartment of an own project apartament complex housing made in 2020 for the city council of Rio Cuarto, Córdoba was evaluated with both methodologies. This is located in a zone of Warm temper climate. The similarities, results, the precisión of input and output data, practicality of implementation, feasibility of evaluating other construction systems and upgrade analysis are discussed. One of the principal results shows a 70% of difference in the requirements for cooling and heating with ADB vs EVN, being 63 and 19 KWh/m2/year respectively. Los edificios en su conjunto son responsables del 36% del consumo mundial de energía y más del 30% de las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero, principalmente por climatización. Esto ha impulsado a numerosos países e instituciones a implementar certificaciones de eficiencia energética y sustentabilidad como el etiquetado de eficiencia energética. El presente trabajo realiza un análisis crítico de algunos resultados obtenidos junto a las ventajas y desventajas que tiene el uso del Etiquetado de Viviendas Nacional (EVN) con respecto al que viene implementando el Área Diseño Bioclimático (ADB) de Tecnologías Constructivas Sustentables del Centro Experimental de la Vivienda Económica. Para ello, se evaluó con ambas metodologías un departamento de un proyecto propio de vivienda multifamiliar realizado en año 2020 para la Municipalidad de Río Cuarto, Córdoba localizada en una zona de clima templado cálido. Se discuten las similitudes, resultados, el grado de precisión de datos de entrada y salida, la practicidad de implementación, la factibilidad de evaluar otros sistemas constructivos y análisis de posibles mejoras. Uno de los principales resultados es el 70% en la diferencia de requerimientos por climatización calculados con ADB vs ENV, siendo 63 y 19 KWh/m2/año respectivamente. Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño 2023-12-11 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42380 10.59047/2469.0724.v9.n11.42380 PENSUM; Vol. 9 Núm. 11 (2023); 146-162 2469-0724 10.59047/2469.0724.v9.n11 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42380/43419 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42380/43565 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42380/43566 Derechos de autor 2023 Halimi Sulaiman, Lautaro Martin Oga Martinez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-371 |
| container_title_str |
PENSUM |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Energetic hygrothermal simulation Housing labeling Bioclimatic design Simulación higrotérmico higrotérmica energética Etiquetado de vivienda Diseño bioclimático |
| spellingShingle |
Energetic hygrothermal simulation Housing labeling Bioclimatic design Simulación higrotérmico higrotérmica energética Etiquetado de vivienda Diseño bioclimático Sulaiman, Halimi Oga Martínez, Lautaro Martín Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| topic_facet |
Energetic hygrothermal simulation Housing labeling Bioclimatic design Simulación higrotérmico higrotérmica energética Etiquetado de vivienda Diseño bioclimático |
| author |
Sulaiman, Halimi Oga Martínez, Lautaro Martín |
| author_facet |
Sulaiman, Halimi Oga Martínez, Lautaro Martín |
| author_sort |
Sulaiman, Halimi |
| title |
Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| title_short |
Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| title_full |
Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| title_fullStr |
Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: Critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| title_sort |
hygrothermal simulation vs. national housing labeling: critical analysis of methodologies and tools |
| description |
Buildings are responsible for 36% of the global energy demand and more than 30% of the greenhouse gasses principally owing to cooling and heating. This has inspired many countries and institutions to implement certifications of energy efficiency and sustainability like energy efficiency labeling. The present work does a critical analysis of some results obtained besides the advantages and disadvantages of the use of National Housing Labeling (EVN) in relation to the implemented by the Bioclimatic design área (ADB) of Sustainable technologies constructions of the Experimental Center for Affordable Housing. To achieve this an apartment of an own project apartament complex housing made in 2020 for the city council of Rio Cuarto, Córdoba was evaluated with both methodologies. This is located in a zone of Warm temper climate. The similarities, results, the precisión of input and output data, practicality of implementation, feasibility of evaluating other construction systems and upgrade analysis are discussed. One of the principal results shows a 70% of difference in the requirements for cooling and heating with ADB vs EVN, being 63 and 19 KWh/m2/year respectively. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/42380 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT sulaimanhalimi hygrothermalsimulationvsnationalhousinglabelingcriticalanalysisofmethodologiesandtools AT ogamartinezlautaromartin hygrothermalsimulationvsnationalhousinglabelingcriticalanalysisofmethodologiesandtools AT sulaimanhalimi simulacionhigrotermicavsetiquetadodeviviendanacionalanalisiscriticodemetodologiasyherramientas AT ogamartinezlautaromartin simulacionhigrotermicavsetiquetadodeviviendanacionalanalisiscriticodemetodologiasyherramientas |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T23:00:44Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T23:00:44Z |
| _version_ |
1809217690942832640 |