The role of the state in the instruments for access to urban land in Rosario
In Argentina, since 2003 there has been a great economic and construction reactivation, where real estate began to behave as a financial asset. However, access to urban land, the main support for housing, for the lower, lower-middle and middle sectors was increasingly difficult. In this context, the...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Diseño
2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pensu/article/view/38286 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In Argentina, since 2003 there has been a great economic and construction reactivation, where real estate began to behave as a financial asset. However, access to urban land, the main support for housing, for the lower, lower-middle and middle sectors was increasingly difficult.
In this context, the objective of the paper is to analyze the financing instruments (international, national and provincial) for access to land, identifying the different roles assumed by the State, implemented in Rosario, a city with the highest construction per inhabitant, paradoxically third in housing deficit. The methodology is based on content analysis of written documents and observation techniques on images.
Since 2002 to date, 9 programs have been approved and 8 have been executed, adding a total of 20,259 beneficiaries between regularized lots, lots with infrastructures and houses built. The instruments applied lack a joint planning between the different levels of government, being the largest financing from the national State Land ownership is heterogeneous in instruments for low sectors and homogeneous for medium and medium-low sectors. The State always acts as an agent providing infrastructure and urban facilities and as a real estate agent in a large part of the programs and lines. |
|---|