Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance
In this work, certain aspects of the body, jouissance and sexuation arepresented, based on references from the gender discourse, establishing acounterpoint with the logic proposed by psychoanalysis. In the case of the firstdiscourse, both sexual identification and the way in which the body is satisf...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Psicología. Cátedra de Psicopatología I
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/32322 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R370-article-32322 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-370 |
| container_title_str |
Pathos |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
cuerpo sexuación género identificación body sexuation gender identification corps sexuation genre identification |
| spellingShingle |
cuerpo sexuación género identificación body sexuation gender identification corps sexuation genre identification Husni, Paula Husni, Paula Husni, Paula Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| topic_facet |
cuerpo sexuación género identificación body sexuation gender identification corps sexuation genre identification |
| author |
Husni, Paula Husni, Paula Husni, Paula |
| author_facet |
Husni, Paula Husni, Paula Husni, Paula |
| author_sort |
Husni, Paula |
| title |
Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| title_short |
Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| title_full |
Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| title_fullStr |
Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| title_sort |
body, era and sexuation: from nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance |
| description |
In this work, certain aspects of the body, jouissance and sexuation arepresented, based on references from the gender discourse, establishing acounterpoint with the logic proposed by psychoanalysis. In the case of the firstdiscourse, both sexual identification and the way in which the body is satisfiedare described as the echo of the mark on the body reproduced by sociallyestablished gender practices in a dominant and heteronormative discourse; inthis sense, they indicate that patriarchal power and dominant binarism skew andcondition the gentile fixation leaving jouissance located only in those erogenouszones. On the side of psychoanalysis, it is underlined that both men and womencan only be conceived as signifiers, that is, they are only semblants that can beunderstood as modes of naming themselves that do not say anything about theposition of jouissance; that is why it is not possible to speak of a standard normof a mode of jouissance, and that is what gender discourse does not know. Forpsychoanalysis, unlike gender discourse, structural violence is defined on thebasis of the encounter of the parlêtre with language, which leaves unique markson which will be based varied and contingent encounters with external, social,and family violence, the violence ―which there is― of the immeasurable turnsof the subject in the world. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Psicología. Cátedra de Psicopatología I |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/32322 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT husnipaula bodyeraandsexuationfromnomadicjouissancetotheimpossibilityofjouissance AT husnipaula bodyeraandsexuationfromnomadicjouissancetotheimpossibilityofjouissance AT husnipaula bodyeraandsexuationfromnomadicjouissancetotheimpossibilityofjouissance AT husnipaula cuerpoepocaysexuaciondelgocenomadealimposibledelgoce AT husnipaula cuerpoepocaysexuaciondelgocenomadealimposibledelgoce AT husnipaula cuerpoepocaysexuaciondelgocenomadealimposibledelgoce AT husnipaula corpstempsetsexuationdelajouissancenomadealimpossibilitedelajouissance AT husnipaula corpstempsetsexuationdelajouissancenomadealimpossibilitedelajouissance AT husnipaula corpstempsetsexuationdelajouissancenomadealimpossibilitedelajouissance |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:59:55Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-02-05T22:23:11Z |
| _version_ |
1823257858211315712 |
| spelling |
I10-R370-article-323222024-07-04T17:45:52Z Body, era and sexuation: From nomadic jouissance to the impossibility of jouissance Cuerpo, época y sexuación: Del goce nómade al imposible del goce Corps, temps et sexuation: De la jouissance nomade à l'impossibilité de la jouissance Husni, Paula Husni, Paula Husni, Paula cuerpo sexuación género identificación body sexuation gender identification corps sexuation genre identification In this work, certain aspects of the body, jouissance and sexuation arepresented, based on references from the gender discourse, establishing acounterpoint with the logic proposed by psychoanalysis. In the case of the firstdiscourse, both sexual identification and the way in which the body is satisfiedare described as the echo of the mark on the body reproduced by sociallyestablished gender practices in a dominant and heteronormative discourse; inthis sense, they indicate that patriarchal power and dominant binarism skew andcondition the gentile fixation leaving jouissance located only in those erogenouszones. On the side of psychoanalysis, it is underlined that both men and womencan only be conceived as signifiers, that is, they are only semblants that can beunderstood as modes of naming themselves that do not say anything about theposition of jouissance; that is why it is not possible to speak of a standard normof a mode of jouissance, and that is what gender discourse does not know. Forpsychoanalysis, unlike gender discourse, structural violence is defined on thebasis of the encounter of the parlêtre with language, which leaves unique markson which will be based varied and contingent encounters with external, social,and family violence, the violence ―which there is― of the immeasurable turnsof the subject in the world. En el presente trabajo se exponen ciertos aspectos en torno al cuerpo, el goce y la sexuación planteados a partir de referentes del discurso de género estableciendo un contrapunto con la lógica que propone el psicoanálisis. En el caso del primer discurso, tanto la identificación sexual como así también el modo en que el cuerpo se satisface, se describen como el eco de la marca en el cuerpo que reproducen las prácticas de género establecidas socialmente en un discurso dominante y heteronormativo. En este sentido, indican que el poder patriarcal y el binarismo dominante sesgan y condicionan la fijación genital dejando localizado el goce solamente en esas zonas erógenas. Por el lado del psicoanálisis, se subraya que tanto el hombre como la mujer sólo pueden ser concebidos como significantes, es decir, sólo se trata de semblantes que pueden entenderse como modos de nombrarse que no dicen con respecto a la posición de goce. Por ello es que no puede hablarse de una norma estándar sobre un modo de goce, y eso es lo que desconoce el discurso de género. Para el psicoanálisis, a diferencia del discurso de género, la violencia estructural es definida a partir del encuentro del parlêtre con el lenguaje, que deja marcas únicas sobre las que se asentarán variados y contingentes encuentros con la violencia externa, social, familiar, la violencia ―que la hay― de las inconmensurables vueltas del sujeto en el mundo. Cet article présente certains aspects du corps, de la jouissance et de la sexuation à partir du discours sur le genre, en établissant un contrepoint avec la logique proposée par la psychanalyse. Dans le cas du premier discours, tant l'identification sexuelle que la manière dont le corps est satisfait sont décrites comme l'écho de la marque sur le corps qui reproduit les pratiques de genre socialement établies dans un discours dominant et hétéronormatif. En ce sens, ils indiquent que le pouvoir patriarcal et le binarisme dominant biaisent et conditionnent la fixation génitale, laissant la jouissance se situer uniquement dans ces zones érogènes. Du côté de la psychanalyse, on souligne que les hommes et les femmes ne peuvent être conçus que comme des signifiants, c'est-à-dire qu'ils ne sont que des semblants qui peuvent être compris comme des modes de désignation qui ne disent rien de la position de la jouissance. C'est pourquoi on ne peut pas parler de norme standard à propos d'un mode de jouissance, et c'est ce que le discours sur le genre ne reconnaît pas. Pour la psychanalyse, à la différence du discours sur le genre, la violence structurelle se définit à partir de la rencontre du parlêtre avec le langage, qui laisse des traces uniques sur lesquelles vont s'installer les rencontres variées et contingentes avec la violence extérieure, sociale, familiale, la violence - qui existe - des tours incommensurables du sujet dans le monde. Facultad de Psicología. Cátedra de Psicopatología I 2021-03-02 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/32322 Pathos; Vol. 2 (2020): Sexuation. Oedipus, logics, jouissance; 23-35 Pathos; Vol. 2 (2020): Sexuación. Edipo, lógicas, goce; 23-35 Pathos; Vol. 2 (2020): Sexuation. Œdipe, logique, jouissance; 23-35 Pathos; v. 2 (2020): Sexuação. Édipo, lógica, gozo; 23-35 2313-9390 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/32322/33128 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/pathos/article/view/32322/43761 Derechos de autor 2021 Paula Husni https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |