Languages without Speakers, Sciences without Indigenous People: A Brief Ideological-Political History of the Study of the Warpe Languages in the Argentinians Linguistics (from the 17th to the 20th Century)
In the Language Sciences, some sociolinguistic representations are interweave when thinking about the relationships between the material conditions of production and the metalinguistic discourses that take part in the socio-political space of language, and –simultaneously– configure a history of the...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Historia
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariohistoria/article/view/40396 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the Language Sciences, some sociolinguistic representations are interweave when thinking about the relationships between the material conditions of production and the metalinguistic discourses that take part in the socio-political space of language, and –simultaneously– configure a history of the study of indigenous languages. These ideologies, applied in/from Linguistics, manifest representations around the Warpe languages (Allentiac and Millcayac) and their groups of speakers. Next, we outline a brief journey through the linguistics that, between the 17th, 19th and 20th centuries, identify three postcards that conclude with their institutionalization in Argentina. Thus, the works that constitute the corpus –Luis de Valdivia, Bartolomé Mitre and Fernando Marquéz Miranda– naturalize and rationalize three linguistic-racial ideologies that support an epistemological whitening and a conception of westernized history as doxas of disciplinary common sense within the theory. There, a coloniality of the knowing and the saying converge. |
|---|