The representative deconstruction of the "landscape". A biopolitical bet from contemporary mountain range artivism
This writing reflects on a series of “artivist” experiences carried out in the department of Punilla, Córdoba, on October 12, in the context of Social, Preventive and Obligatory Isolation (ASPO) and during the environmental emergency due to the mountain fires of the months August, September and Octo...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/34550 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This writing reflects on a series of “artivist” experiences carried out in the department of Punilla, Córdoba, on October 12, in the context of Social, Preventive and Obligatory Isolation (ASPO) and during the environmental emergency due to the mountain fires of the months August, September and October 2020. The experiences presented, from the political and critical point of view in art, are defined as such according to their tactical and local contextualization in the act and in the situation (Richard, 2011). They arise “visible” from affective and ethical commitments of political-artistic action in the Punilla Valley, Córdoba, emerging in its configurative matrix, from processes that link “eco-feminisms” in a local key, varied proposals for habitat management, bio-sustainable pedagogies, multiple forms of labor cooperativism and searches in terms of food sovereignty. These forms of action framed in the configuring bio-environment, enunciated as alternative practices and in resistance from biopower, biopolitics and biotechnology, link art, functionality, technologies and use of materials with a long historical projection, emerging as nodes of projection and production local, paradigmatic and transdisciplinary of contemporary mountain artistry, where disciplinary cuts become blurred and promote discursive focuses of critical linkage between aesthetics (s) and politics (s). |
|---|