In a long time. Notes on the dialogical reconstruction of the avant-garde shock
In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Producción e Investigación en Artes, Facultad de Artes, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/ART/article/view/25319 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this paper I will try to relate the criticism of Hal Foster to the implications of shock –or of the aesthetics of shock, as I understand it– that Peter Bürger maintains in the Theory of the avant-garde (1974), with certain notions that the German author outlines in his article "The aesthetic truth" (1988). I will explain how a part of the objections that Foster presents are answered in that article and this will lead us to a point of convergence between both authors, who borrow conceptual tools from psychoanalysis. However, as I will show, such convergence can also be understood in pragmatic-communicative terms. |
|---|