Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making
In parliamentary systems of government, the struggle for political power is widespread in intra- and inter-party politics. Parliamentary debates constitute institutionally ratified practices of multiparty political deliberation through dialogue-for and against-the representatives of democratically e...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC)
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/31523 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R357-article-31523 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| spelling |
I10-R357-article-315232022-07-05T03:29:44Z Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making Debates parlamentarios. Modos de acción retórica institucionalizada para la adopción de decisiones colectivas Ilie, Cornelia Debate parlamentario Análisis de discurso Política representativa Parliamentary debate Discourse Analysis Representative politics In parliamentary systems of government, the struggle for political power is widespread in intra- and inter-party politics. Parliamentary debates constitute institutionally ratified practices of multiparty political deliberation through dialogue-for and against-the representatives of democratically elected citizens.Taking as case studies the parliaments of the United Kingdom and some European countries, this article outlines, illustrates, and examines the following major issues related to parliamentary debates: deliberative practices, the gender and sub-genres of parliamentary discourse, target audiences and publics, roles of representatives and key issues in the debates. En los sistemas de gobierno parlamentario, la lucha por el poder político se despliega ampliamente en la política intra e interpartidaria. Los debates parlamentarios constituyen prácticas institucionalmente ratificadas de deliberación política multipartidista a través del diálogo- a favor y en contra -de los representantes de los ciudadanos elegidos democráticamene.Tomando como casos de estudio los parlamentos británico y de algunos países europeos, en este artículo se esbozan, ilustran y examinan las siguientes cuestiones principales relacionadas con los debates parlamentarios: prácticas de deliberación, el género y subgéneros del discurso parlamentario, destinatarios y públicos, funciones de los representantes, temas clave en los debates. Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC) 2020-12-18 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/31523 Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS); Núm. 10 (2020): Julio - Diciembre ; 186-206 2524-9568 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/31523/32241 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/31523/32242 Derechos de autor 2020 Cornelia Ilie http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-357 |
| container_title_str |
Administración Pública y Sociedad (APyS) |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
Debate parlamentario Análisis de discurso Política representativa Parliamentary debate Discourse Analysis Representative politics |
| spellingShingle |
Debate parlamentario Análisis de discurso Política representativa Parliamentary debate Discourse Analysis Representative politics Ilie, Cornelia Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| topic_facet |
Debate parlamentario Análisis de discurso Política representativa Parliamentary debate Discourse Analysis Representative politics |
| author |
Ilie, Cornelia |
| author_facet |
Ilie, Cornelia |
| author_sort |
Ilie, Cornelia |
| title |
Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| title_short |
Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| title_full |
Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| title_fullStr |
Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Parliamentary debates. Institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| title_sort |
parliamentary debates. institutionalized modes of rhetoric action for collective decision-making |
| description |
In parliamentary systems of government, the struggle for political power is widespread in intra- and inter-party politics. Parliamentary debates constitute institutionally ratified practices of multiparty political deliberation through dialogue-for and against-the representatives of democratically elected citizens.Taking as case studies the parliaments of the United Kingdom and some European countries, this article outlines, illustrates, and examines the following major issues related to parliamentary debates: deliberative practices, the gender and sub-genres of parliamentary discourse, target audiences and publics, roles of representatives and key issues in the debates. |
| publisher |
Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Administración Pública (IIFAP-FCS-UNC) |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/APyS/article/view/31523 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT iliecornelia parliamentarydebatesinstitutionalizedmodesofrhetoricactionforcollectivedecisionmaking AT iliecornelia debatesparlamentariosmodosdeaccionretoricainstitucionalizadaparalaadopciondedecisionescolectivas |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:22:21Z |
| last_indexed |
2024-09-03T22:22:21Z |
| _version_ |
1809215276054478848 |