The Case Caroline. A precedent of international self-defense?
The part of the international doctrine, that argue for the existence of a right to preventive self-defense in the international law, invoke the case Caroline as his precedent. This article aims to show why this case is neither a precedent of preventive self-defense nor a precedent of self-defense. T...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/6289 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The part of the international doctrine, that argue for the existence of a right to preventive self-defense in the international law, invoke the case Caroline as his precedent. This article aims to show why this case is neither a precedent of preventive self-defense nor a precedent of self-defense. The conclusion is that the case Caroline is to be revaluate as a precedent of international necessity and not as one of self-defense, on the ground of the absence of a state as active subject, that execute an armed attack in the sense of the legal institution of the international self-defense. |
|---|