The "Thomas" case and two aspects of procedural legitimacy: The right to legality and legislators
On June 15, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in the "Thomas" case. National Congressman Enrique Thomas initiated an amparo action against the National State, stating that his rights as a legislator had been violated in the process of sanctioning Law 26.522 (known as the "media law")...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/5884 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | On June 15, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in the "Thomas" case. National Congressman Enrique Thomas initiated an amparo action against the National State, stating that his rights as a legislator had been violated in the process of sanctioning Law 26.522 (known as the "media law"), since such a process would have been "irregular". |
|---|