THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law

This article makes a critical analysis of the Solicitor of the Treasury’s doctrine -held since 2002- concerning the unconstitutionality of the article 38 of the Public Employment Act which establishes that administrative summaries must be conducted within six months. It is not intended to defend the...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fihman, Ramiro Manuel
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Derecho 2021
Materias:
Summaries
Administrative law
Constitutional law
Reasonable period
Solicitor of the Treasury
Sumarios
Derecho administrativo
Derecho constitucional
Plazo razonable
Procuración del Tesoro
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/32683
Aporte de:
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R353-article-32683
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R353-article-326832021-04-09T20:40:19Z THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law EL PODER EJECUTIVO, LA POTESTAD DISCIPLINARIA Y EL PLAZO RAZONABLE: Un análisis crítico de la doctrina de la procuración del tesoro de la nación sobre la inconstitucionalidad del artículo 38 de la ley de empleo público Fihman, Ramiro Manuel Summaries Administrative law Constitutional law Reasonable period Solicitor of the Treasury Sumarios Derecho administrativo Derecho constitucional Plazo razonable Procuración del Tesoro This article makes a critical analysis of the Solicitor of the Treasury’s doctrine -held since 2002- concerning the unconstitutionality of the article 38 of the Public Employment Act which establishes that administrative summaries must be conducted within six months. It is not intended to defend the reasonableness of that period, but to demonstrate that the Solicitor of the Treasury’s decisions regarding this issue suffer from several shortcomings which make its subsequent decisions invalid. One of the main assumptions of this interpretation will be specially refuted: the fact that the executive power has the ability to not to fulfill a Law because it is considered as unconstitutional. El presente trabajo lleva a cabo un análisis crítico de la doctrina sostenida desde el año 2002 por la Procuración del Tesoro de la Nación con relación a que el artículo 38 de la Ley Marco de Regulación del Empleo Público Nacional -que establece un plazo máximo de seis meses para sustanciar un sumario administrativo- sería inaplicable por inconstitucional. No se pretende defender la razonabilidad de uno u otro plazo sino demostrar que los dictámenes producidos por el máximo órgano asesor del Poder Ejecutivo Nacional adolecen de graves defectos que tornan inválidos sus argumentos y las conclusiones posteriores emanadas de ellos. Se discute con especial énfasis uno de los presupuestos de esta interpretación, que es la facultad de la Administración de no aplicar una Ley por considerarla inconstitucional. Facultad de Derecho 2021-04-09 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/32683 Revista de la Facultad de Derecho; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2020): NUEVA SERIE II; 171-206 2314-3061 1850-9371 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/32683/33369 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-353
container_title_str Revista de la Facultad de Derecho
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Summaries
Administrative law
Constitutional law
Reasonable period
Solicitor of the Treasury
Sumarios
Derecho administrativo
Derecho constitucional
Plazo razonable
Procuración del Tesoro
spellingShingle Summaries
Administrative law
Constitutional law
Reasonable period
Solicitor of the Treasury
Sumarios
Derecho administrativo
Derecho constitucional
Plazo razonable
Procuración del Tesoro
Fihman, Ramiro Manuel
THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
topic_facet Summaries
Administrative law
Constitutional law
Reasonable period
Solicitor of the Treasury
Sumarios
Derecho administrativo
Derecho constitucional
Plazo razonable
Procuración del Tesoro
author Fihman, Ramiro Manuel
author_facet Fihman, Ramiro Manuel
author_sort Fihman, Ramiro Manuel
title THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
title_short THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
title_full THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
title_fullStr THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
title_full_unstemmed THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE DISCIPLINARY POWER AND THE REASONABLE TERM: A critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
title_sort executive branch, the disciplinary power and the reasonable term: a critical analysis of the doctrine of the solicitor of the treasury of the nation on the unconstitutionality of article 38 of the public employment law
description This article makes a critical analysis of the Solicitor of the Treasury’s doctrine -held since 2002- concerning the unconstitutionality of the article 38 of the Public Employment Act which establishes that administrative summaries must be conducted within six months. It is not intended to defend the reasonableness of that period, but to demonstrate that the Solicitor of the Treasury’s decisions regarding this issue suffer from several shortcomings which make its subsequent decisions invalid. One of the main assumptions of this interpretation will be specially refuted: the fact that the executive power has the ability to not to fulfill a Law because it is considered as unconstitutional.
publisher Facultad de Derecho
publishDate 2021
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/32683
work_keys_str_mv AT fihmanramiromanuel theexecutivebranchthedisciplinarypowerandthereasonabletermacriticalanalysisofthedoctrineofthesolicitorofthetreasuryofthenationontheunconstitutionalityofarticle38ofthepublicemploymentlaw
AT fihmanramiromanuel elpoderejecutivolapotestaddisciplinariayelplazorazonableunanalisiscriticodeladoctrinadelaprocuraciondeltesorodelanacionsobrelainconstitucionalidaddelarticulo38delaleydeempleopublico
AT fihmanramiromanuel executivebranchthedisciplinarypowerandthereasonabletermacriticalanalysisofthedoctrineofthesolicitorofthetreasuryofthenationontheunconstitutionalityofarticle38ofthepublicemploymentlaw
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:18:25Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T22:18:25Z
_version_ 1809215028110295040

Ejemplares similares