Argentina's recent past at the crossroads of multiple temporalities. A reflection situated in two micro-social research experiences
The work analyzes the potentialities that emerge from the approach to the study of certain phenomena, processes and/or dimensions of the recent past of Argentina from multiple temporal scales. The starting point of this reflection is our research that focuses on the study of the subjectivities, expe...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/cuadernosdehistoriaeys/article/view/33556 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The work analyzes the potentialities that emerge from the approach to the study of certain phenomena, processes and/or dimensions of the recent past of Argentina from multiple temporal scales. The starting point of this reflection is our research that focuses on the study of the subjectivities, experiences and representations of various social actors in the last Argentine military dictatorship (1976-1983) and in the framework of the South Atlantic conflict (1982) from a microanalytical perspective. In the paper, therefore, we explore the different ways in which the intersection between different temporalities are fundamental to enrich the situated and historical understanding of the experiences and perceptions of the social actors studied.The work is organized around three moments. In the first, we make a balance of the use of different temporal scales in the historiography of social attitudes in the last military dictatorship and in the Malvinas war. From this examination, we approach the potentialities of crossing different durations to understand the experiences, practices and representations of the actors. Finally, we reflect on the need that our research has in common to consider certain variables and contexts that are inserted in multiple temporalities, as well as the effects of this analysis on the historical understanding of both objects of inquiry. |
|---|