The nature/culture separation in crisis. The barequeo: r-e-existing by the permanence in the canyon of the Cauca river
This paper is the result of reflections made from a complex viewpoint between critical geography, political ecology and ecological anthropology, which implies having a perspective of analysis on the interrelations and reciprocities between human and non-human beings. This, in specific contexts, wher...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/intersticios/article/view/28866 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | This paper is the result of reflections made from a complex viewpoint between critical geography, political ecology and ecological anthropology, which implies having a perspective of analysis on the interrelations and reciprocities between human and non-human beings. This, in specific contexts, where knowledge has been generated according to the particular situations that unleashed the imposition of the capitalist model and the struggles for its re-existence. It deals with the configuration of subjectivities in the communities of the Cauca River Canyon, in Antioquia, Colombia, especially in the search for patrimonialization as a tool to safeguard the Barequeo as a way of life. This search takes place during the process of installation of the Hidroituango hydroelectric plant, supported by the energy transition. In order to elaborate the work, it was first necessary to carry out a brief analysis of the notion of nature and the difference with the concept of environment, a category that, from the dual scheme, bursts into the life of the populations. Later, the glocal strategy was approached from a place perspective, which has been generated in the defense of life and territory; being the place who gives meaning and allows thinking beyond the imposed development. Finally, an approach was made to what has been the process of requesting patrimonialization, as an articulation with the political project of the organization in movement. The request was rejected, but in the process the modern/colonial continuities became evident, which continue to manage life on the basis of Eurocentric, racial and patriarchal classifications. |
|---|