INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE JUDGES’ DISSENTING OPINIONS AND THE ABUSE OF RIGHT
The present work tries to analyze the notion of abuse of law in international law through the ICJ jurisprudence. Is it a right? A dogma? A principle that enters the general principles of international law? These are some of the questions that will be answered through the dissenting opinion of the ju...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho. Departamento de Derecho Público
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recordip/article/view/44043 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The present work tries to analyze the notion of abuse of law in international law through the
ICJ jurisprudence. Is it a right? A dogma? A principle that enters the general principles of international law?
These are some of the questions that will be answered through the dissenting opinion of the judges in various
cases of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The doctrine, as we will see, has tried to support or "deny"
some of the judges' positions by putting in place new ideas of approach to the subject that is always topical and
continuously developing. |
|---|