Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review
In Wuhan-China, an outbreak of pneumonia of idiopathic origin was identified in December 2019; the causative agent was isolated in January 2020; a new variant of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was declared by the World Health Organization (OMS) as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the ways of tr...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Odontología
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/36871 |
| Aporte de: |
| id |
I10-R335-article-36871 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| institution_str |
I-10 |
| repository_str |
R-335 |
| container_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Odontología |
| language |
Español |
| format |
Artículo revista |
| topic |
SARS-CoV-2 antiseptics buckles chlorhexidine hydrogen peroxide povidone iodine inactivation virus SARS-CoV-2 antisépticos bucales clorhexidina peróxido de hidrógeno povidona yodada inactivación |
| spellingShingle |
SARS-CoV-2 antiseptics buckles chlorhexidine hydrogen peroxide povidone iodine inactivation virus SARS-CoV-2 antisépticos bucales clorhexidina peróxido de hidrógeno povidona yodada inactivación Fajardo-Sotamba , Henry Gabriel VASQUEZ PALACIOS, ANA CRISTINA Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review |
| topic_facet |
SARS-CoV-2 antiseptics buckles chlorhexidine hydrogen peroxide povidone iodine inactivation virus SARS-CoV-2 antisépticos bucales clorhexidina peróxido de hidrógeno povidona yodada inactivación |
| author |
Fajardo-Sotamba , Henry Gabriel VASQUEZ PALACIOS, ANA CRISTINA |
| author_facet |
Fajardo-Sotamba , Henry Gabriel VASQUEZ PALACIOS, ANA CRISTINA |
| author_sort |
Fajardo-Sotamba , Henry Gabriel |
| title |
Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review |
| title_short |
Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review |
| title_full |
Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review |
| title_fullStr |
Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review |
| title_sort |
efficacy in reducing oral viral load (sars-cov-2) of three types of mouthwashes. literature review |
| description |
In Wuhan-China, an outbreak of pneumonia of idiopathic origin was identified in December 2019; the causative agent was isolated in January 2020; a new variant of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was declared by the World Health Organization (OMS) as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the ways of transmission this virus has shown a high ease of contagion, spreading rapidly, it is known that approximately 148 million infected and 3.012 million died from SARS-CoV-2, affecting more than 190 countries in 5 continents. It is important for health personnel due to the working conditions to which they are exposed, being this in order to the optimal conditions for the acquisition of this pathology. Objective: To compare the efficacy and efficiency of the use of mouthwashes: hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine and chlorhexidine against SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Materials and methods: A search were carried out in the databases of PubMed, SAGE JOURNAL, ACP, Medigraphic, PMC, which were selected according to the inclusion criteria, obtaining 30 studies Results: Chlorhexidine (CHX) at concentrations of 0. 12% and 2% did not show a statistically significant index capable of inactivating SARS-CoV-2 viral load, Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) showed minimal inactivation to SARS-CoV-2 virus at concentrations of 0. 5%, 1.25% or 1.5%, Povidone iodine (PVP-I) is able to inactivate SARS-CoV-2, at concentrations of 0.5%, 1.25% and 1.5%, in contact periods of 60 seconds, which reduces the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: It can be evidenced that the different mouthwashes with bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects are an important reference with the aim of protecting the professional as well as the community. The rinse that showed the greatest effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 virus was iodopovidone with the ability to inactivate the virus and thus prevent its spread. |
| publisher |
Facultad de Odontología |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| url |
https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/36871 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT fajardosotambahenrygabriel efficacyinreducingoralviralloadsarscov2ofthreetypesofmouthwashesliteraturereview AT vasquezpalaciosanacristina efficacyinreducingoralviralloadsarscov2ofthreetypesofmouthwashesliteraturereview AT fajardosotambahenrygabriel eficaciaenlareducciondecargaviralbucalsarscov2detrestiposdecolutoriosrevisiondeliteratura AT vasquezpalaciosanacristina eficaciaenlareducciondecargaviralbucalsarscov2detrestiposdecolutoriosrevisiondeliteratura |
| first_indexed |
2024-09-03T21:16:24Z |
| last_indexed |
2025-10-27T05:09:31Z |
| _version_ |
1848378764991397888 |
| spelling |
I10-R335-article-368712025-10-23T14:15:03Z Efficacy in reducing oral viral load (SARS-CoV-2) of three types of mouthwashes. Literature review Eficacia en la reducción de carga viral Bucal (SARS-CoV-2) de tres tipos de colutorios. Revisión de literatura Fajardo-Sotamba , Henry Gabriel VASQUEZ PALACIOS, ANA CRISTINA SARS-CoV-2 antiseptics buckles chlorhexidine hydrogen peroxide povidone iodine inactivation virus SARS-CoV-2 antisépticos bucales clorhexidina peróxido de hidrógeno povidona yodada inactivación In Wuhan-China, an outbreak of pneumonia of idiopathic origin was identified in December 2019; the causative agent was isolated in January 2020; a new variant of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was declared by the World Health Organization (OMS) as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the ways of transmission this virus has shown a high ease of contagion, spreading rapidly, it is known that approximately 148 million infected and 3.012 million died from SARS-CoV-2, affecting more than 190 countries in 5 continents. It is important for health personnel due to the working conditions to which they are exposed, being this in order to the optimal conditions for the acquisition of this pathology. Objective: To compare the efficacy and efficiency of the use of mouthwashes: hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine and chlorhexidine against SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Materials and methods: A search were carried out in the databases of PubMed, SAGE JOURNAL, ACP, Medigraphic, PMC, which were selected according to the inclusion criteria, obtaining 30 studies Results: Chlorhexidine (CHX) at concentrations of 0. 12% and 2% did not show a statistically significant index capable of inactivating SARS-CoV-2 viral load, Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) showed minimal inactivation to SARS-CoV-2 virus at concentrations of 0. 5%, 1.25% or 1.5%, Povidone iodine (PVP-I) is able to inactivate SARS-CoV-2, at concentrations of 0.5%, 1.25% and 1.5%, in contact periods of 60 seconds, which reduces the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion: It can be evidenced that the different mouthwashes with bactericidal or bacteriostatic effects are an important reference with the aim of protecting the professional as well as the community. The rinse that showed the greatest effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 virus was iodopovidone with the ability to inactivate the virus and thus prevent its spread. En Wuhan-China se identificó en diciembre del 2019 un brote de neumonía de origen idiopático; aislandosé en enero del 2020 el agente causal; una nueva variante de coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) declarandoló por la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019( COVID-19). Debido a las vías de transmisión este virus a mostrado una alta facilidad de contagios, expandiéndose rápidamente, se conoce que aproximadamente 148 millones de infectados y 3.012 millones de fallecidos por SARS-CoV-2, afectando a más de 190 países en 5 continentes. Importante para el personal de salud debido a las condiciones de trabajo a los que se encuentra expuesto, siendo este a fin a las condiciones óptimas para la adquisición de esta patología. Objetivo: Comparar la eficacia y eficiencia del uso de enjuagues bucales: peróxido de hidrógeno, yodo povidona y clorhexidina frente a la carga viral de SARS-CoV-2. Materiales y métodos: Se efectuó una búsqueda en las bases de datos de PubMed, SAGE JOURNAL, ACP, Medigraphic, PMC los cuales fueron seleccionados acorde a los criterios de inclusión obteniendo 30 estudios Resultados: La Clorhexidina (CHX) en concentraciones 0.12% y 2% no mostró un índice significativamente estadístico capaz de inactivar la carga viral del SARS-CoV-2, el Peróxido de hidrógeno (H2O2) mostró una inactivación mínima ante el virus SARS-CoV-2 en concentraciones de 0.5%, 1.25% o 1.5%, la Yodo povidona (PVP-I) es capaz de inactivar el SARS-CoV-2, en concentraciones 0,5%, 1,25% y 1,5 %, en períodos de contacto de 60 segundos, lo cual reduce la transmisión del SARS-CoV-2. Conclusión: Se puede evidencia que los diferentes enjuagues bucales con efectos bactericidas o bacteriostáticos son un referente importante con el objetivo de proteger al profesional como así también a la comunidad. El enjuague que mostró mayor efectividad frente al virus SARS-CoV-2, fue la yodopovidona con la capacidad para inactivar el virus y así evitar su propagación. Facultad de Odontología 2022-03-04 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/36871 Revista de la Facultad de Odontología; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2022): Rev Fac Odont 32(1)-2022-Marzo; 4-10 2545-7594 0325-1071 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/RevFacOdonto/article/view/36871/37177 10.25014/ Derechos de autor 2022 Henry Gabriel Fajardo-Sotamba , ANA CRISTINA VASQUEZ PALACIOS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |