Dissents in the southern border – 19th century

The unfinished and partially published manuscripts of Santiago Avendaño, interpreter and mediator between the Pampa Indians and the civil and military Christian society, were produced between 1854 and the beginning of the 1870s, in the marginal space of the southern border and from another edge, tha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Diez, Beatriz
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Letras 2019
Materias:
nation
borders
inclusion
indian friends
nación
fronteras
inclusión
indios amigos
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/27345
Aporte de:
Heterotopías de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R333-article-27345
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R333-article-273452020-02-27T15:31:21Z Dissents in the southern border – 19th century Disensos en la frontera sur del siglo XIX Diez, Beatriz nation borders inclusion indian friends nación fronteras inclusión indios amigos The unfinished and partially published manuscripts of Santiago Avendaño, interpreter and mediator between the Pampa Indians and the civil and military Christian society, were produced between 1854 and the beginning of the 1870s, in the marginal space of the southern border and from another edge, that of its author, ex-captive of hesitant identity that acted between two worlds, generating perhaps mistrust in both. In these borders, the Manuscripts elaborate a double critical gesture: rupture with the doxa that confined the Indians to barbarism, establishing their inability to access any form of civilization, and dissent, hardly manifested, with the weaknesses of the nation-state that was being formed after Caseros. To investigate the hesitations and contradictions of a complex approach text, we have chosen, whithin the framework of the discourse analysis and according to the methodology proposed by E. Arnoux (2006), to follow the nation object and its components, narrowing that search in this article to a fragment that shows an episode of maximum tension between local officials accused of corruption and a tribe of Indian friends. The double critical gesture is articulated with the construction of the damaged homeland object. The Manuscripts show in this search a double vocation of testimony: that of the native populations of the Pampas experience, on their way to the place of ethnic minority that the budding nation state was preparing for them, and that of the positions of its author who defended confusingly an inclusive nation project. Los Manuscritos inconclusos y parcialmente publicados de Santiago Avendaño, intérprete y mediador entre los indios de la Pampa y la sociedad cristiana civil y militar, fueron producidos entre 1854 y comienzos de la década de 1870, en el espacio marginal de la frontera sur, desde otro borde, el de su autor, ex-cautivo de identidad vacilante que actuaba entre dos mundos, generando quizás desconfianza en ambos. En esas fronteras, los Manuscritos elaboran un doble gesto crítico: ruptura con la doxa excluyente que confinaba al indio a la barbarie, decretando su incapacidad para acceder a la civilización occidental, y disidencia, dificultosamente manifestada, con las falencias del estado nación en formación después de Caseros.             Para indagar las vacilaciones y contradicciones de un texto de abordaje complejo, optamos, en el marco del análisis del discurso y según la metodología que propone E. Arnoux (2006), por el seguimiento del objeto nación y sus componentes, acotándonos en este artículo a un fragmento que pone en escena un episodio de tensión máxima entre funcionarios locales acusados de corrupción y una tribu de indios amigos. El doble gesto crítico se articula con la construcción del objeto patria dañada. Los Manuscritos muestran en ese seguimiento una doble vocación de testimonio: el del recorrido de los habitantes originarios de la Pampa hacia el lugar de minoría étnica que le preparaba el estado nación en ciernes y el de los posicionamientos de su autor que defendía confusamente un proyecto de nación inclusiva. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Letras 2019-12-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/27345 Heterotopías; Vol. 2 No. 4 (2019): “Languages and dissenting speeches”; 1-36 Heterotopías; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2019): “Lenguas y discursos disidentes”; 1-36 2618-2726 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/27345/28964
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-333
container_title_str Heterotopías
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic nation
borders
inclusion
indian friends
nación
fronteras
inclusión
indios amigos
spellingShingle nation
borders
inclusion
indian friends
nación
fronteras
inclusión
indios amigos
Diez, Beatriz
Dissents in the southern border – 19th century
topic_facet nation
borders
inclusion
indian friends
nación
fronteras
inclusión
indios amigos
author Diez, Beatriz
author_facet Diez, Beatriz
author_sort Diez, Beatriz
title Dissents in the southern border – 19th century
title_short Dissents in the southern border – 19th century
title_full Dissents in the southern border – 19th century
title_fullStr Dissents in the southern border – 19th century
title_full_unstemmed Dissents in the southern border – 19th century
title_sort dissents in the southern border – 19th century
description The unfinished and partially published manuscripts of Santiago Avendaño, interpreter and mediator between the Pampa Indians and the civil and military Christian society, were produced between 1854 and the beginning of the 1870s, in the marginal space of the southern border and from another edge, that of its author, ex-captive of hesitant identity that acted between two worlds, generating perhaps mistrust in both. In these borders, the Manuscripts elaborate a double critical gesture: rupture with the doxa that confined the Indians to barbarism, establishing their inability to access any form of civilization, and dissent, hardly manifested, with the weaknesses of the nation-state that was being formed after Caseros. To investigate the hesitations and contradictions of a complex approach text, we have chosen, whithin the framework of the discourse analysis and according to the methodology proposed by E. Arnoux (2006), to follow the nation object and its components, narrowing that search in this article to a fragment that shows an episode of maximum tension between local officials accused of corruption and a tribe of Indian friends. The double critical gesture is articulated with the construction of the damaged homeland object. The Manuscripts show in this search a double vocation of testimony: that of the native populations of the Pampas experience, on their way to the place of ethnic minority that the budding nation state was preparing for them, and that of the positions of its author who defended confusingly an inclusive nation project.
publisher Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades. Escuela de Letras
publishDate 2019
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterotopias/article/view/27345
work_keys_str_mv AT diezbeatriz dissentsinthesouthernborder19thcentury
AT diezbeatriz disensosenlafronterasurdelsigloxix
first_indexed 2024-09-03T21:09:20Z
last_indexed 2024-09-03T21:09:20Z
_version_ 1809210682603732992

Ejemplares similares