Construction and Validation of the School Bullying and Cyberbullying Questionnaire (CACE) through Expert Judgment
The objective of this article is to validate the items of a psychometric test on bullying and cyberbullying through the constitution of an expert panel. A mixed methodology with quantitative predominance was used based on the demonstration of four theoretical criteria (sufficiency, clarity, coherenc...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI, Conicet-UNC)
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/41014 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The objective of this article is to validate the items of a psychometric test on bullying and cyberbullying through the constitution of an expert panel. A mixed methodology with quantitative predominance was used based on the demonstration of four theoretical criteria (sufficiency, clarity, coherence and relevance) for each of the items. For the quantitative analysis, we worked with the model of Hyrkäs et al. (2003), Friedman’s statistics, Kendall’s W and Aiken’s V. The qualitative analysis was developed following the methodology of Strauss and Corbin’s Grounded Theory (2016). The results show optimal levels of quality in the specific domain of the variable measured and evaluated. Consequently, they indicate that the instrument submitted for evaluation by a panel of experts presents coherent and adequate psychometric indicators in relation to the variables it intends to investigate. |
|---|