Validation of the job performance scale in argentinean workers.
The aim of this study was to validate and analyze psychometric properties of Koopmans et al. (2013) Individual Work Performance Scale. A pilot study with 31 postgraduate students was performed to assay the operational equivalence of the scale. A main study was carried out, in or...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIPSI, Conicet-UNC)
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/15714 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The aim of this study was to validate and analyze psychometric properties of Koopmans et al. (2013) Individual Work Performance Scale. A pilot study with 31 postgraduate students was performed to assay the operational equivalence of the scale. A main study was carried out, in order to analyze the psychometric properties of the scale adapted in the pilot study. This time, the non-probabilistic sample comprised 434 workers. Factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were executed over the data obtained. Both of them indicated a trifactorial structure with adequate internal consistency (task performance: ? = .76, counterproductive behaviors: ? = .76, and contextual performance: ? = .72), composite reliability (CR greater than .70), and convergent validity (AVE greater than .50). Argentinean version of the instrument was conformed by 13 items and proved to be a reliable and parsimonious scale to measure perceived job performance. |
|---|