The case of Hipólito Piñero: vicissitudes of a family to continue.
In patrimony formation process, it is necessary to distinguish patrimony (the whole material and immaterial things (utilities) of a person and the rights over them), from patrimonial behaviours (this means the motivations of a person in the process of accumulation, reproduction and transmission of t...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti
2003
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/23287 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In patrimony formation process, it is necessary to distinguish patrimony (the whole material and immaterial things (utilities) of a person and the rights over them), from patrimonial behaviours (this means the motivations of a person in the process of accumulation, reproduction and transmission of the capital). Instead of the point of view adopted is the individual one, we will havein charge the composition of familiar structures (although they could be diversified, for a determinate moment and time, it is possible to find some dominant forms); the kind of familiar relations (between parents and sons and among brothers, what conduce us to state the problem between authority freedom; economic dependence-economic independence; preferences, predilections, favoritism-relegation, repulses, rejections); and the ties and belonging to nets (ties of compaternity, parentage, friendship, clientship, loyalty, favours and politic adhesions with the vinculums with the power, what would allow to obtain the benefit through the influence and the intermediation). |
|---|