The Bicentennial in Uruguay. Validity and problematization of the essential contents of the classical nationalist imaginary.
The commemoration of the Bicentenary in Latin America is a propitious occasion to reflect on the diversity of issues related to the history of the states that constitute it. In this article (referred to Uruguay) we will: a) Examine, from the perspective of history of historiography, the process of s...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Históricos Profesor Carlos S. A. Segreti
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuarioceh/article/view/23141 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | The commemoration of the Bicentenary in Latin America is a propitious occasion to reflect on the diversity of issues related to the history of the states that constitute it. In this article (referred to Uruguay) we will: a) Examine, from the perspective of history of historiography, the process of setting classic nationalist imaginary; b) investigate the causes of problematization and the crisis of its contents (mainly in its core notions of independence, collective identity and repertoire-foundational mythemes from 1960 and displayed under the “Year of the Bicentennial Celebration of the Oriental Emancipation Process”); c) explore the reasons for the delayed development of alternative and prospective imaginary consensus, both from the social sciences and the political system. |
|---|