WhatsApp as evidence. Procedural and Constitutional Questions
In this article its analyzed WhatsApp as evidence and questions from the Procedural Law and Constitutional scope. As first premise, it’s analyzed WhatsApp as an unnominated way to proof and the principle of freedom of proof. As second premise, it to consider WhatsApp as an unsigned instrument. Third...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/procesal/article/view/40815 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In this article its analyzed WhatsApp as evidence and questions from the Procedural Law and Constitutional scope. As first premise, it’s analyzed WhatsApp as an unnominated way to proof and the principle of freedom of proof. As second premise, it to consider WhatsApp as an unsigned instrument. Third premise is to consider WhatsApp as correspondence and its constitutional and conventional consequences. Last it is analyzed the evidence activity and presents conclusions. |
|---|