Dialogue between Feminist Epistemology and Trans Epistemology: toward the construction of a collective and heterogeneous science

Feminist studies have sought, since their beginnings, to break with the androcentric and heteropatriarchal biases that exist in science. Women have been systematically objectified, invisibilized and delegitimized, and the gender perspective has not been contemplated or has been displaced to a periph...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malvacio, Carla Daniela, Torres D'Eramo, Consuelo
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Cátedra B de Problemas Epistemológicos de la Psicología de la Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/heterocronias/article/view/39969
Aporte de:
Descripción
Sumario:Feminist studies have sought, since their beginnings, to break with the androcentric and heteropatriarchal biases that exist in science. Women have been systematically objectified, invisibilized and delegitimized, and the gender perspective has not been contemplated or has been displaced to a peripheral place within the disciplines. However, women have not been the only ones excluded. Since its inception, science has been built under a binary logic, which has resulted in the exclusion of dissidents, who seek recognition of their own epistemic subjectivity, recognizing the differences with other subjects and types of knowledge -including feminism, where they have often been framed. As cis women in formation within the academy we seek to reflect on the logics of academia, and from this article, to discuss the limits of feminist epistemology to generate an approach to trans epistemology and break the sexist biases found within the academy (biases that range from the enunciation of academic discourses to scientific practices). Understandingthe tensions that exist, we also seek to generate a dialogue between different epistemologies, since we believe that the production of knowledge should be generated collectively but also heterogeneously.