Judicial sources and the study of subaltern sectors. Challenges and possibilities of their relationship in historiographic research
In the last decades, judicial sources have consolidated as a key empirical resource when it comes necessary to approach to the historical experience of subaltern sectors. Through those documents it has been possible to found a series of voices generally absent in the most recurred historiographic so...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Centro de Estudios Históricos “Prof. Carlos S. A. Segreti”
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refa/article/view/34191 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | In the last decades, judicial sources have consolidated as a key empirical resource when it comes necessary to approach to the historical experience of subaltern sectors. Through those documents it has been possible to found a series of voices generally absent in the most recurred historiographic sources. The incorporation of those archives to the historical investigation has made possible not only to give more visibility to those social groups, but also has permitted the formulation of new perspectives in a variety of historiographical subjects, thus defying prevailing consensus about a certain problem. It is the purpose of this article to think about the possibilities that the judicial archives bears to the study of subaltern sectors, not in theoretical terms but instead in the light of a specific experience of investigation in the national territories of northern Patagonia. |
|---|