The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism

The rights acquired by women and sexual diversity have aroused great controversy and counter-reactions within society from different sectors and actors, giving rise to disputes and tensions of rights that are initially presented as opposites. One of these tensions that appears most strongly between...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Armando, Sofía
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/45021
Aporte de:
id I10-R282-article-45021
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R282-article-450212025-12-19T16:31:26Z The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism Los límites al derecho a la libertaad y sus tensiones con otros dereechos: análisis de sus abordajes y construcciones desde el activismo judicial feminista Armando, Sofía activismo judicial libertad religiosa libertad de expresión feminismos discriminación judicial activism religious freedom freedom of expression feminisms discriminación The rights acquired by women and sexual diversity have aroused great controversy and counter-reactions within society from different sectors and actors, giving rise to disputes and tensions of rights that are initially presented as opposites. One of these tensions that appears most strongly between feminisms and their detractors is the one between the right to freedom in its various variants -religious, of expression, of teaching- and the rights of women and sexual diversity. The aim of this article is to analyze how feminist judicial activism legally constructs this tension, analyzing the different arguments used to support it and to tilt it in favor of the rights of women and sexual diversity. To this end, three judicial/administrative complaints filed by feminist civil society organizations against educational institutions of different levels, due to the allegedly discriminatory curricular contents taught in them, will be comparatively analyzed. The elements and arguments in common between these complaints will be investigated in order to unravel the political, institutional and technical-legal debates that make up their positions and constructions on the various limits to the right to freedom. Los derechos adquiridos por parte de las mujeres y de la diversidad sexual han despertado dentro de la sociedad grandes controversias y contra reacciones por parte de distintos sectores y actores, dando lugar a disputas y tensiones de derechos que se presentan en un primer momento como opuestos. Una de dichas tensiones que aparecen con más fuerza entre los feminismos y sus detractores, es la que se presenta entre el derecho a la libertad en sus diversas variantes –religiosa, de expresión, de cátedra–, y los derechos de las mujeres y de la diversidad sexual El objetivo de este artículo es analizar cómo el activismo judicial feminista construye jurídicamente dicha tensión, analizando los distintos argumentos que esgrimen para sostenerla e inclinarla a favor de los derechos de las mujeres y de la diversidad sexual. Para dicho fin, se analizarán comparativamente tres denuncias judiciales/administrativas presentadas por organizaciones de la sociedad civil feministas contra instituciones educativas de diferentes niveles, a causa de los contenidos curriculares presuntamente discriminatorios dictados en ellas. Se indagará sobre los elementos y argumentos en común entre dichas denuncias para desentrañar los debates políticos, institucionales y técnicos-jurídicos que hacen a sus posicionamientos y construcciones sobre los diversos límites al derecho de la libertad. Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET 2024-06-14 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/45021 Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales; Núm. XXII (2024): ANUARIO XXII; 268-269 1667-6122 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/45021/51649 Derechos de autor 2024 Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-282
container_title_str Anuario del Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic activismo judicial
libertad religiosa
libertad de expresión
feminismos
discriminación
judicial activism
religious freedom
freedom of expression
feminisms
discriminación
spellingShingle activismo judicial
libertad religiosa
libertad de expresión
feminismos
discriminación
judicial activism
religious freedom
freedom of expression
feminisms
discriminación
Armando, Sofía
The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
topic_facet activismo judicial
libertad religiosa
libertad de expresión
feminismos
discriminación
judicial activism
religious freedom
freedom of expression
feminisms
discriminación
author Armando, Sofía
author_facet Armando, Sofía
author_sort Armando, Sofía
title The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
title_short The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
title_full The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
title_fullStr The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
title_full_unstemmed The limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
title_sort limits to the right to fredom and its tensions with other rights: analysis of its approaches and constructions from feminist judicial activism
description The rights acquired by women and sexual diversity have aroused great controversy and counter-reactions within society from different sectors and actors, giving rise to disputes and tensions of rights that are initially presented as opposites. One of these tensions that appears most strongly between feminisms and their detractors is the one between the right to freedom in its various variants -religious, of expression, of teaching- and the rights of women and sexual diversity. The aim of this article is to analyze how feminist judicial activism legally constructs this tension, analyzing the different arguments used to support it and to tilt it in favor of the rights of women and sexual diversity. To this end, three judicial/administrative complaints filed by feminist civil society organizations against educational institutions of different levels, due to the allegedly discriminatory curricular contents taught in them, will be comparatively analyzed. The elements and arguments in common between these complaints will be investigated in order to unravel the political, institutional and technical-legal debates that make up their positions and constructions on the various limits to the right to freedom.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales - FD - UNC - CONICET
publishDate 2024
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/anuariocijs/article/view/45021
work_keys_str_mv AT armandosofia thelimitstotherighttofredomanditstensionswithotherrightsanalysisofitsapproachesandconstructionsfromfeministjudicialactivism
AT armandosofia loslimitesalderechoalalibertaadysustensionesconotrosdereechosanalisisdesusabordajesyconstruccionesdesdeelactivismojudicialfeminista
AT armandosofia limitstotherighttofredomanditstensionswithotherrightsanalysisofitsapproachesandconstructionsfromfeministjudicialactivism
first_indexed 2024-09-03T22:38:55Z
last_indexed 2025-12-27T05:00:41Z
_version_ 1852636283949547520