Hacia una arqueología de la guerra como si la práctica importara: Comentado por Elizabeth Arkush y Verónica Williams
We compare two theoretical programs for the archaeological study of war. The Positivist program, the most visible one in the current literature, seeks to identify the universal causes and consequences of war on the assumption that it unfolds always according to the same rationality. As an alternativ...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo publishedVersion Opinion essay peer-reviewed Ensayo evaluado por comentaristas invitados |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Instituto de Arqueología y Museo, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e IML, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán
2014
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://publicaciones.csnat.unt.edu.ar/index.php/mundodeantes/article/view/134 http://suquia.ffyh.unc.edu.ar/handle/suquia/10081 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | We compare two theoretical programs for the archaeological study of war. The Positivist program, the most visible one in the current literature, seeks to identify the universal causes and consequences of war on the assumption that it unfolds always according to the same rationality. As an alternative, we discuss a perspective that, putting emphasis on practice itself, takes into consideration the diverse cultural logics that govern organized hostility between collectives in different times and places. |
|---|