CARL MENGER IN SAN JOSÉ DE COSTA RICA? ABOUT A GAME OF MIRRORS BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL AND PLURALIST THEORISTS
As suggested by certain experts, human rights protection systems have not only supported the consideration of international treaties as paradigmatic documents in constitutional adjudication by national operators, they have also sponsored a decisive hermeneutic canon by virtue of which they must meri...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo revista |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Derecho
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/refade/article/view/29916 |
| Aporte de: |
| Sumario: | As suggested by certain experts, human rights protection systems have not only supported the consideration of international treaties as paradigmatic documents in constitutional adjudication by national operators, they have also sponsored a decisive hermeneutic canon by virtue of which they must merit special treatment in so far as they are presented as living instruments, whose proper exegesis has to accompany the evolution of the times and the conditions of current life. Such frequent characterization in the annals of Inter-American jurisprudence, raises attractive problems regarding the degree of interaction that interpreters establish between Constitutional Law and International Human Rights Law. |
|---|