DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

This article focuses on the conceptual and political crossroads of two contemporary writings, Frantz Fanon´s and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari´s, and it reads them in the precise moment they develop a critique of representation as a philosophical and political category. We take inductions presen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Oto, Alejandro, Pósleman, Cristina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2016
Materias:
Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/14293
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10article-14293
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
spellingShingle Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
De Oto, Alejandro
Pósleman, Cristina
DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
topic_facet Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
author De Oto, Alejandro
Pósleman, Cristina
author_facet De Oto, Alejandro
Pósleman, Cristina
author_sort De Oto, Alejandro
title DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_short DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_full DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_fullStr DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_full_unstemmed DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_sort damned bodies. philosophy, writing, and racialization
description This article focuses on the conceptual and political crossroads of two contemporary writings, Frantz Fanon´s and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari´s, and it reads them in the precise moment they develop a critique of representation as a philosophical and political category. We take inductions present in it to draw our own involvement in such criticism. Both writings are committed not only to produce a critical movement of modernity but also of colonialism, especially Fanon. The latter category, often retracted, is crucial to connect texts and concepts to understand the organizational dimension of bodies in the colonial difference and racialization. Fanon´s texts predate, chronologically speaking, to Deleuze and Guattari work. However, both are part of the critical process that began in the mid-twentieth century, particularly from the historical movement of decolonization. While each of these writings is initially aimed at different audiences, both offer comparable interventions which make sense for a heuristic, in our present, of modern/colonial relationships.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2016
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/14293
work_keys_str_mv AT deotoalejandro damnedbodiesphilosophywritingandracialization
AT poslemancristina damnedbodiesphilosophywritingandracialization
AT deotoalejandro malditoscuerposfilosofiaescriturayracializacion
AT poslemancristina malditoscuerposfilosofiaescriturayracializacion
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819781357142017

Ejemplares similares