DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?

Mostrar todas las versiones(2)

Contemporary democratic societies are characterized by two inescapable empirical phenomena: 1) The existence of deep, persistent and ineradicable political disagreements within each democratic society; 2) the need for political action courses common to all citizens (Waldron, 2005: 18). The aggregati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2015
Materias:
pluralismo político
cooperación política
democracia agregativa
democracia agonal
democracia deliberativa.
political pluralism
political cooperation
aggregative democracy
agonistic democracy
deliberative democracy.
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/10734
Aporte de:
Aportado por : Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba .
id I10-R10article-10734
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic pluralismo político
cooperación política
democracia agregativa
democracia agonal
democracia deliberativa.
political pluralism
political cooperation
aggregative democracy
agonistic democracy
deliberative democracy.
spellingShingle pluralismo político
cooperación política
democracia agregativa
democracia agonal
democracia deliberativa.
political pluralism
political cooperation
aggregative democracy
agonistic democracy
deliberative democracy.
Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?
topic_facet pluralismo político
cooperación política
democracia agregativa
democracia agonal
democracia deliberativa.
political pluralism
political cooperation
aggregative democracy
agonistic democracy
deliberative democracy.
author Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
author_facet Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
author_sort Olivares, Nicolás Emanuel
title DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?
title_short DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?
title_full DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?
title_fullStr DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?
title_full_unstemmed DOES CONTEMPORARY DEMOCRACY DEMANDS AGONISM OR DELIBERATION?
title_sort does contemporary democracy demands agonism or deliberation?
description Contemporary democratic societies are characterized by two inescapable empirical phenomena: 1) The existence of deep, persistent and ineradicable political disagreements within each democratic society; 2) the need for political action courses common to all citizens (Waldron, 2005: 18). The aggregative democratic conception, receipted by most political constitutions, has shown some weaknesses to address this reality. In response, two rival democratic conceptions have emerged, namely: a) agonistic-pluralist; and b) deliberative-republican. This article aims to: 1) reconstruct the conceptual and normative assumptions of these two conceptions; 2) contrast them; and 3) outline arguments for a deliberative-republican democratic conception. The methodology used is the analytical political philosophy, namely: a) rational reconstruction of concepts; and b) reflective equilibrium. The present work aims to contribute to the ongoing debate about which is the best normative conception of democracy to adopt in non ideal contemporary normative conditions.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2015
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/10734
work_keys_str_mv AT olivaresnicolasemanuel doescontemporarydemocracydemandsagonismordeliberation
AT olivaresnicolasemanuel lademocraciacontemporaneademandaagonismoodeliberacion
bdutipo_str Revistas
_version_ 1764819780230971395

Ejemplares similares