Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection

Since its beginnings in 2012, this research is situated in the crossroad between sociosemiotics and gender studies, analyzing the ways sexual diversity, non-normative sexual identities and new family models have been reconfigured in different sections of social discourse in Argentina in the two firs...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bustos, Silvia, Ceballos, Florencia, Cisneros, Florencia, Rotger, Patricia, Uzin, Magdalena
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/31267
Aporte de:
id I10-R10-article-31267
record_format ojs
spelling I10-R10-article-312672020-12-15T00:31:37Z Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection Políticas discursivas de la diversidad sexual: Tecnologías de los afectos Bustos, Silvia Ceballos, Florencia Cisneros, Florencia Rotger, Patricia Uzin, Magdalena diversity discourse affection gender politics diversidad discurso afectos géneros políticas Since its beginnings in 2012, this research is situated in the crossroad between sociosemiotics and gender studies, analyzing the ways sexual diversity, non-normative sexual identities and new family models have been reconfigured in different sections of social discourse in Argentina in the two first decades of the 21st century. Our theoretical path builds a genealogy that thinks the relationships between Foucault’s technologies of the self, Teresa de Lauretis’ gender technologies, Haraway’s and Preciado’s contributions, and the relations between feminist theory and affective turn (Sarah Ahmed, Cecilia Macón, Leonor Arfuch). We revisit Laclau’s, Lotman’s, Angenot’s definitions of Rhetoric, to think the political and persuasive dimension of discourse as a naturalization technology, in the analysis of a variety of discourses (literature, written press, educational materials, performances, audiovisual fiction, etc.), building on the hypothesis that the acceptability of non-heteronormative identities and affectivities, as discursive politics is grounded in the social validation of the emotions they put in play and articulate fundamental social evaluations and ideologemes. Desde sus inicios en 2012, el proyecto se enmarca en el cruce entre la sociosemiótica y los estudios de género, analizando los modos en que la diversidad sexual, las identidades sexuales no normativas y los nuevos modelos de familia han sido reconfigurados en distintos sectores del discurso social argentino de las dos primeras décadas del s. XXI. Nuestro recorrido teórico construye una genealogía que piensa las relaciones entre las tecnologías del yo de Foucault, las tecnologías de género de Teresa de Lauretis, las propuestas de Haraway y Preciado, y las relaciones entre teoría feminista y giro afectivo (Sarah Ahmed, Cecilia Macón, Leonor Arfuch). Retomamos las definiciones de la retórica de Laclau, Lotman y Angenot para pensar la dimensión política y persuasiva de los discursos como una tecnología de la naturalización en el análisis de una variedad de discursos (literatura, prensa escrita, materiales educativos, performances, ficción audiovisual, etc.), partiendo de la hipótesis de que la aceptabilidad de las identidades y afectividades no heteronormativas, como política discursiva, se sustenta en la validación social de las emociones que se ponen en juego en ellas, que articulan valoraciones sociales e ideologemas fundamentales. Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades 2020-12-12 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf text/html https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/31267 Recial; Vol. 11 Núm. 18 (2020): Dossier: El cerco de los signos: comunidad, palabra y libertad en la literatura del sur argentino chileno del siglo XXI / DOSSIER ANIVERSARIO: Décimo Aniversario de la Revista RECIAL. La investigación en la Facultad de Filosofía en la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba 2718-658X 1853-4112 10.53971/2718.658x.v11.n18 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/31267/31904 https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/31267/31905 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic diversity
discourse
affection
gender
politics
diversidad
discurso
afectos
géneros
políticas
spellingShingle diversity
discourse
affection
gender
politics
diversidad
discurso
afectos
géneros
políticas
Bustos, Silvia
Ceballos, Florencia
Cisneros, Florencia
Rotger, Patricia
Uzin, Magdalena
Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection
topic_facet diversity
discourse
affection
gender
politics
diversidad
discurso
afectos
géneros
políticas
author Bustos, Silvia
Ceballos, Florencia
Cisneros, Florencia
Rotger, Patricia
Uzin, Magdalena
author_facet Bustos, Silvia
Ceballos, Florencia
Cisneros, Florencia
Rotger, Patricia
Uzin, Magdalena
author_sort Bustos, Silvia
title Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection
title_short Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection
title_full Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection
title_fullStr Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection
title_full_unstemmed Discursive politics on sexual diversity: Technologies of affection
title_sort discursive politics on sexual diversity: technologies of affection
description Since its beginnings in 2012, this research is situated in the crossroad between sociosemiotics and gender studies, analyzing the ways sexual diversity, non-normative sexual identities and new family models have been reconfigured in different sections of social discourse in Argentina in the two first decades of the 21st century. Our theoretical path builds a genealogy that thinks the relationships between Foucault’s technologies of the self, Teresa de Lauretis’ gender technologies, Haraway’s and Preciado’s contributions, and the relations between feminist theory and affective turn (Sarah Ahmed, Cecilia Macón, Leonor Arfuch). We revisit Laclau’s, Lotman’s, Angenot’s definitions of Rhetoric, to think the political and persuasive dimension of discourse as a naturalization technology, in the analysis of a variety of discourses (literature, written press, educational materials, performances, audiovisual fiction, etc.), building on the hypothesis that the acceptability of non-heteronormative identities and affectivities, as discursive politics is grounded in the social validation of the emotions they put in play and articulate fundamental social evaluations and ideologemes.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades
publishDate 2020
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/recial/article/view/31267
work_keys_str_mv AT bustossilvia discursivepoliticsonsexualdiversitytechnologiesofaffection
AT ceballosflorencia discursivepoliticsonsexualdiversitytechnologiesofaffection
AT cisnerosflorencia discursivepoliticsonsexualdiversitytechnologiesofaffection
AT rotgerpatricia discursivepoliticsonsexualdiversitytechnologiesofaffection
AT uzinmagdalena discursivepoliticsonsexualdiversitytechnologiesofaffection
AT bustossilvia politicasdiscursivasdeladiversidadsexualtecnologiasdelosafectos
AT ceballosflorencia politicasdiscursivasdeladiversidadsexualtecnologiasdelosafectos
AT cisnerosflorencia politicasdiscursivasdeladiversidadsexualtecnologiasdelosafectos
AT rotgerpatricia politicasdiscursivasdeladiversidadsexualtecnologiasdelosafectos
AT uzinmagdalena politicasdiscursivasdeladiversidadsexualtecnologiasdelosafectos
first_indexed 2022-08-20T01:13:37Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T01:13:37Z
_version_ 1770717979132035072