DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION

Mostrar todas las versiones(3)

This article focuses on the conceptual and political crossroads of two contemporary writings, Frantz Fanon´s and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari´s, and it reads them in the precise moment they develop a critique of representation as a philosophical and political category. We take inductions presen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Oto, Alejandro, Pósleman, Cristina
Formato: Artículo revista
Lenguaje:Español
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2016
Materias:
Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/14293
Aporte de:
Revistas de la UNC de Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
id I10-R10-article-14293
record_format ojs
institution Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
institution_str I-10
repository_str R-10
container_title_str Revistas de la UNC
language Español
format Artículo revista
topic Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
spellingShingle Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
De Oto, Alejandro
Pósleman, Cristina
DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
topic_facet Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos
author De Oto, Alejandro
Pósleman, Cristina
author_facet De Oto, Alejandro
Pósleman, Cristina
author_sort De Oto, Alejandro
title DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_short DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_full DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_fullStr DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_full_unstemmed DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION
title_sort damned bodies. philosophy, writing, and racialization
description This article focuses on the conceptual and political crossroads of two contemporary writings, Frantz Fanon´s and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari´s, and it reads them in the precise moment they develop a critique of representation as a philosophical and political category. We take inductions present in it to draw our own involvement in such criticism. Both writings are committed not only to produce a critical movement of modernity but also of colonialism, especially Fanon. The latter category, often retracted, is crucial to connect texts and concepts to understand the organizational dimension of bodies in the colonial difference and racialization. Fanon´s texts predate, chronologically speaking, to Deleuze and Guattari work. However, both are part of the critical process that began in the mid-twentieth century, particularly from the historical movement of decolonization. While each of these writings is initially aimed at different audiences, both offer comparable interventions which make sense for a heuristic, in our present, of modern/colonial relationships.
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad
publishDate 2016
url https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/14293
work_keys_str_mv AT deotoalejandro damnedbodiesphilosophywritingandracialization
AT poslemancristina damnedbodiesphilosophywritingandracialization
AT deotoalejandro malditoscuerposfilosofiaescriturayracializacion
AT poslemancristina malditoscuerposfilosofiaescriturayracializacion
first_indexed 2022-08-20T00:48:30Z
last_indexed 2022-08-20T00:48:30Z
_version_ 1770716036202496000
spelling I10-R10-article-142932016-12-28T10:40:31Z DAMNED BODIES. PHILOSOPHY, WRITING, AND RACIALIZATION MALDITOS CUERPOS. FILOSOFÍA, ESCRITURA Y RACIALIZACIÓN De Oto, Alejandro Pósleman, Cristina Fanon-Deleuze-Guattari-Representación-Cuerpos This article focuses on the conceptual and political crossroads of two contemporary writings, Frantz Fanon´s and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari´s, and it reads them in the precise moment they develop a critique of representation as a philosophical and political category. We take inductions present in it to draw our own involvement in such criticism. Both writings are committed not only to produce a critical movement of modernity but also of colonialism, especially Fanon. The latter category, often retracted, is crucial to connect texts and concepts to understand the organizational dimension of bodies in the colonial difference and racialization. Fanon´s texts predate, chronologically speaking, to Deleuze and Guattari work. However, both are part of the critical process that began in the mid-twentieth century, particularly from the historical movement of decolonization. While each of these writings is initially aimed at different audiences, both offer comparable interventions which make sense for a heuristic, in our present, of modern/colonial relationships. El artículo se concentra en el cruce conceptual y político de dos escrituras, las de Frantz Fanon y Gilles Deleuze y Félix Guattari, en el momento en que trabajan una crítica a la representación como categoría filosófica y política. Aprovechamos las inducciones que están en él para trazar nuestra propia intervención en dicha crítica. Hemos puesto en contacto estas dos escrituras porque apostamos a comprenderlas dentro de un movimiento crítico de la modernidad, pero también de la colonialidad. Esta última categoría, con frecuencia escamoteada, permite conectar textos, conceptos y escrituras para entender la dimensión organizacional de los cuerpos en la diferencia colonial y en la racialización. Los textos de Fanon son anteriores, cronológicamente hablando, a los de Deleuze y Guattari. No obstante, los tres autores participan del proceso crítico que se inició a mediados de siglo XX, en particular a partir del movimiento histórico de la descolonización. Si bien cada una de estas escrituras apunta inicialmente a audiencias distintas, ambas ofrecen intervenciones asimilables entre sí para una heurística en nuestro presente de la relación modernidad/colonialidad.    Abstract This article focuses on the conceptual and political crossroads of two contemporary writings, Frantz Fanon´s and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari´s, and it read them in the precise moment they develop a critique of representation as a philosophical and political category. We take inductions that are in it to draw our own involvement in such criticism. Both writings are committed not only to produce a critical movement of modernity but also of coloniality, especially Fanon. The latter category, often retracted, is crucial to connect texts and concepts to understand the organizational dimension of bodies in the colonial difference and racialization. Fanon´s texts predate, chronologically speaking, to Deleuze and Guattari work. However, both are part of the critical process that began in the mid-twentieth century, particularly from the historical movement of decolonization. While each of these writings is initially aimed at different audiences, both offer comparable interventions which make sense for a heuristic, in our present, of modern/colonial relationships. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad 2016-12-27 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares application/pdf https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/14293 Astrolabio; No. 17 (2016): PASADO Y PRESENTE DE LAS POLÍTICAS Y PRÁCTICAS DE CONTROL Y VIGILANCIA DE LA MIGRACIÓN EN SUDAMÉRICA; 174-192 Astrolabio; Núm. 17 (2016): PASADO Y PRESENTE DE LAS POLÍTICAS Y PRÁCTICAS DE CONTROL Y VIGILANCIA DE LA MIGRACIÓN EN SUDAMÉRICA; 174-192 Astrolabio; n. 17 (2016): PASADO Y PRESENTE DE LAS POLÍTICAS Y PRÁCTICAS DE CONTROL Y VIGILANCIA DE LA MIGRACIÓN EN SUDAMÉRICA; 174-192 1668-7515 10.55441/1668.7515.n17 spa https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/astrolabio/article/view/14293/16207

Ejemplares similares