Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila

The genetic and ecological basis of viability and developmental time differences between Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae were analysed using the isofemale line technique. Several isofemale lines were sampled from pairs of allopatric/sympatric populations of each species. Flies were reared in me...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Fanara, J.J
Otros Autores: Folguera, G., Iriarte, P.F, Mensch, J., Hasson, E.
Formato: Capítulo de libro
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2006
Acceso en línea:Registro en Scopus
DOI
Handle
Registro en la Biblioteca Digital
Aporte de:Registro referencial: Solicitar el recurso aquí
Descripción
Sumario:The genetic and ecological basis of viability and developmental time differences between Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae were analysed using the isofemale line technique. Several isofemale lines were sampled from pairs of allopatric/sympatric populations of each species. Flies were reared in media prepared with decaying tissues of two of the main natural cactus hosts of each species. This experimental design enabled us to evaluate the relative contribution of phenotypic plasticity, genetic variation and genotype by environment interaction (G × E) to total phenotypic variation for two fitness traits, viability and developmental time. Our results revealed significant G × E in both traits, suggesting that the maintenance of genetic variation can be explained, at least in part, by diversifying selection in different patches of a heterogeneous environment in both species. However, the relative importance of the factors involved in the G × E varied between traits and populations within species. For viability, the G × E can be mainly attributed to changes in the rank order of lines across cacti. However, the pattern was different for developmental time. In D. buzzatii the G × E can be mainly accounted for by changes in among line variance across cacti, whereas changes in the rank order of lines across cacti was the main component in D. koepferae. These dissimilar patterns of variation between traits and species suggest that the evolutionary forces shaping genetic variation for developmental time and viability vary between populations within species and between species. © 2006 European Society for Evolutionary Biology.
Bibliografía:Anholt, R.R.H., Dilda, C., Chang, S., Fanara, J.J., Kulkarni, N., Ganguly, I., Rollman, S., MacKay, T.F.C., The genetic architecture of odor-guided behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: Epistasis and the transcriptome (2003) Nat Genet., 35, pp. 180-184
Berlocher, S.H., Feder, J.L., Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: Moving beyond controversy (2002) Ann. Rev. Entomol, 47, pp. 773-815
Betrán, E., Santos, M., Ruiz, A., Antagonistic pleiotropy effect of second chromosome inversions on body size and early life-history traits in Drosophila buzzatii (1998) Evolution, 52, pp. 144-154
Conner, J.C., Hartl, D.L., (2004) A Primer of Ecological Genetics.. Sinauer Sunderland, MA
Cortese, M., Norry, F., Piccinali, R., Hasson, E., Direct and correlated responses to artificial selection on developmental time and wing length in Drosophila buzzatii (2002) Evolution, 56, pp. 2541-2547
David, J., A new medium for rearing Drosophila in axenic conditions (1962) DIS, 36, p. 128
Debat, V., David, P., Mapping phenotypes: Canalization, plasticity and developmental stability (2001) Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, pp. 555-561
Etges, W.J., Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis (1990) Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, pp. 121-143. , In: eds. MacIntyre R.J. Starmer W.T. Barker J.S.F. Plenum Press New York pp
Etges, W.J., Genetics of host-cactus response and life history evolution among ancestral and derived populations of Drosophila mojavensis (1993) Evolution, 47, pp. 750-767
Fanara, J.J., Hasson, E., Oviposition acceptance and fecundity schedule in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae on their natural hosts (2001) Evolution, 55, pp. 2615-2619
Fanara, J.J., Hasson, E., Fontdevila, A., Oviposition preference, viability, developmental time and body size in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila koepferae and D. buzzatii in association to their natural host (1999) Evol. Ecol., 13, pp. 173-190
Fanara, J.J., Hasson, E., Rodríguez, C., Santos, M., Fontdevila, A., Are Opuntia hosts a selective factor for the inversion polymorphism of Drosophila buzzatii (1996) Heredity, 77, pp. 500-508
Fanara, J.J., Mensch, J., Folguera, G., Hasson, E., Developmental time and thorax length differences between the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae reared in different natural hosts (2004) Evol. Ecol., 18, pp. 203-214
Fanara, J.J., Robinson, K.O., Rollmann, S.M., Anholt, R.R.H., MacKay, T.F.C., Vanaso is a candidate Quantitative trait gene for Drosophila olfactory behavior (2002) Genetics, 162, pp. 1321-1328
Fernández Iriarte, P., Hasson, E., The role of the use of different cactus hosts in the maintenance of the inversion polymorphism in the cactophilic Drosophila buzzatii (2000) Evolution, 54, pp. 1295-1302
Fernández Iriarte, P., Rodríguez, C., Hasson, E., Inversion and allozyme polymorphism show contrasting patterns of microgeographic population structure in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii (2002) J. Evol. Biol., 15, pp. 226-234
Fontdevila, A., Pla, C., Hasson, E., Wasserman, M., Sanchez, A., Naveira, H., Ruiz, A., Drosophila koepferae: A new member of the Drosophila serido (Diptera: Drosophilidae) superspecies taxon (1988) Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 81, pp. 380-385
Gillespie, J.H., Turelli, M., Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation (1989) Genetics, 121, pp. 129-138
Gómez, G.A., Hasson, E., Transespecific polymorphisms in an inversion linked esterase locus (est-a) in Drosophila buzzatii (2003) Mol. Biol. Evol., 20, pp. 410-423
Gurganus, M.C., Fry, J.D., Nuzhdin, S.V., Pasyukova, E.G., Lyman, R.F., MacKay, T.C.F., Genotype-environment interaction for quantitative trait loci affecting sensory bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster (1998) Genetics, 149, pp. 1883-1898
Harbison, S., Yamamoto, A., Fanara, J.J., MacKay, T.F.C., Quantitative trait loci affecting starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster (2004) Genetics, 166, pp. 1807-1823
Hasson, E., Naveira, H., Fontdevila, A., The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXX. the breeding sites of the Argentinean species of the Drosophila mulleri complex. (subgenus Drosophila- Repleta Group) (1992) Rev. Chilena de Hist. Nat., 65, pp. 319-326
Hasson, E., Rodríguez, C., Fanara, J.J., Naveira, H., Reig, O.A., Fontdevila, A., The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXI. Macrogeographic patterns of inversion polymorphism in New World populations (1995) J. Evol. Biol., 8, pp. 369-384
Hedrick, P.W., Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments: A decade later (1986) Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 17, pp. 535-566
Hedrick, P.W., (2005) Genetics of Populations.. Jones and Bartlett Publishers Boston, MA
Jaenike, J., Factors maintaining genetic variation for host preference in Drosophila (1990) Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila, pp. 121-143. , In: eds. MacIntyre R.J. Starmer W.T. Barker J.S.F. Plenum Press New York pp
Joshi, A., Thompson, J.N., Trade-offs and evolution of host specialization (1995) Evol. Ecol., 92, pp. 82-92
Joshi, A., Thompson, J.N., Adaptation and specialization in a two-resource environment in Drosophila species (1997) Evolution, 51, pp. 846-855
Krebs, R.A., Barker, J.S.F., Coexistence of ecologically similar colonising species. Intra- and interspecific competition in Drosophila aldrichi and D. buzzatii (1991) Australian J. Zool., 39, pp. 579-593
Krebs, R.A., Barker, J.S.F., Coexistence of ecologically similar colonising species. II. Populations differentiation in Drosophila aldrichi and D. buzzatii for competitive effects and responces at different temperatures and allozyme variation in D. aldrichi (1993) J. Evol. Biol., 6, pp. 281-298
Laayouni, H., Hasson, E., Santos, M., Fontdevila, A., Inversion Polymorphism and Nucleotide Variability in Different Regions of the Second-Chromosome of Drosophila buzzatii (2003) Mol. Biol. Evol., 20, pp. 931-944
Lynch, M., Walsh, B., (1998) Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits.. Sinauer Sunderland, MA
Mitler, C., Futuyma, D.J., An evolutionary-genetic view of host plant utilization by insects (1983) Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems, pp. 427-459. , In: eds. McClure M.S. Denno R.F. Academic Press NY pp
Norry, F.M., Vilardi, J.C., Hasson, E., Genetic and phenotypic correlations among size-related traits, and heritability variation between body parts in Drosophila buzzatii (1997) Genetica, 101, pp. 131-139
Piccinali, R., Aguadé, M., Hasson, E., Comparative molecular population genetics of the locus xdh in the cactophilic sibling species Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae in the arid zones of Argentina (2004) Mol. Biol. Evol., 21, pp. 117-128
Powell, P., (1997) Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology: The Drosophila Model.. Oxford University Press New York
Robertson, A., The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient (1959) Biometrics, 15, pp. 469-485
Rodríguez, C., Fanara, J.J., Hasson, E., Inversion polymorphism, longevity, and body size in a natural population of Drosophila buzzatii (1999) Evolution, 53, pp. 612-620
Rodríguez, C., Piccinali, R., Levy, E., Hasson, E., Contrasting patterns of population structure using allozyme variation and the inversion polymorphism in Drosophila buzzatii (2000) J. Evol. Biol., 13, pp. 976-984
Roff, D.A., (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis.. Chapman & Hall New York
Rossi, M., Barrio, E., Latorre, A., Quezada-Diaz, J.E., Hasson, E., Moya, A., Fontdevila, A., The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXX. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in original and colonizing populations (1996) Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, pp. 314-323
Ruiz, A., Heed, W.B., Host-plant specify in the cactophilic Drosophila mulleri species complex (1988) J. Anim. Ecol., 57, pp. 237-249
Ruiz, A., Wasserman, M., Evolutionary cytogenetics of the Drosophila buzzatii species complex (1993) Heredity, 70, pp. 582-596
Scheiner, S.M., Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity (1993) Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 24, pp. 35-68
Scheiner, S.M., Berrigan, D., The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VIII. the cost of plasticity in Daphnia pulex (1998) Evolution, 52, pp. 368-378
Scheiner, S.M., Lyman, R.F., The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Response to selection (1991) J. Evol. Biol., 4, pp. 23-50
Schlichting, C., Pigliucci, M., (1998) Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective.. Sinauer Sunderland, Ma
Schmalhausen, I.I., (1949) Factors of Evolution: The Theory of Stabilizing Selection.. Blakiston Philadelphia
(2001) Statistica User's Guide..q9 StatSoft Inc. Release 6.0 Edition, StatSoft Inc. Tulsa, OK
Stearns, S.C., (1992) The Evolution of Life Histories.. Oxford University Press New York
Ungerer, M.C., Halldorsdottir, S.S., Purugganan, M.D., MacKay, T.F.C., Genotype-environment interactions at quantitative trait loci affecting inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana (2003) Genetics, 165, pp. 353-365
Van Tienderen, P.H., Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments (1991) Evolution, 45, pp. 1317-1331
Van Tienderen, P.H., Generalists, specialists, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in sympatric populations of distinct species (1997) Evolution, 51, pp. 1372-1380
Via, S., Gomulkiewicz, R., De Jong, G., Scheiner, S.M., Schlichting, C.D., Van Tienderen, P.H., Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: Consensus and controversies (1995) Trends Ecol. Evol., 10, pp. 212-217
Via, S., Lande, R., Evolution of genetic variation in a spatially heterogeneous environment (1987) Genet. Res., 49, pp. 147-156
Vilela, C.A., A revision of the Drosophila species group (Diptera-Drosophilidae) (1983) Rev. Brasil. Entomol., 27, pp. 1-14
West-Eberhard, M.J., Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity (1989) Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20, pp. 249-278
ISSN:1010061X
DOI:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01084.x